Hi !

Thanks for your feedback. I hadn't realised that the order of the elements in a relation was important. Thank you for the correction.

Regarding the turn relation, it was a mistake and I will delete it.

Errata : Aucune modification n'a été faite sur la L90.

Thank you for your advice !

Hello,
Thanks for the comments !

I will correct this mistake and some omissions.

For the L26 relation, I would like to keep all ways belonging to that line in the relation, even if razed parts are discontinuous. What do you think about this ?

Hello,

My apologies for these errors. I hadn't downloaded the relations thinking that my changes wouldn't affect them.

I will download them systematically in the future.

Hello,

On parts not affected by the works at Y.Josaphat (L161/2, L28, ...), the track layout in OSM, the Infrabel layout and the tracks visible in the Urbis satellite images are correctly superimposed. This tells me that the layers were correctly calibrated.

From a few images that I can't use directly for mapping, the general shape of the tracks seems correct. We'll have to see with the next satellite images or updates of the dataset used.

Hi Tjoeker,
My sources are personal knowledge gained by myself or with the help of train drivers.

The speeds that I have given are those allowed by ETCS (deployed in south of Brussels in June 2023), which are sometimes higher than the speeds allowed by trackside signals.

L2 et non L3