are you actually reviewing these objects?

In this changeset alone, I was able to find 10 more objects almost immediately that suggest that this was not manual review. none of these appear to represent an actual building on the map.
way/1196635281
way/1196635266
way/1196635270
way/1196635278
way/1196635275
way/1196635287
way/1196635298
way/1196634418
way/1196634116
way/1196636208

I also find it extremely suspicious that you have added nearly 300,000 buildings in under a week.

If you aren't manually reviewing all objects, you need to follow the import guidelines and automated edits code of conduct
osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines
osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

What I mean is that the geometry is not accurate. If you look on the imagery, the objects I linked do not line up with the building footprint. Please look again.

I'm looking at the mapbox imagery in OSMcha, and the building footprints do not align at all. I would not accept these buildings for that reason if I was actually manually reviewing these objects.

what do you mean verified results? after a few seconds of looking I found these

way/1196638202

way/1196638797

If I was manually reviewing mapwithai objects, these would not be included. are you actually looking at all objects being uploaded?

Hi,

Where was this import discussed?

Hi John,

Trunk in Louisiana are defined at:
osm.wiki/Louisiana/Highway_Classification

I've changed the roads you edited to be trunk, since they don't meet the local definition.

I've fixed the issues with the lake,

Those objects are generated as a byproduct of the process I use to conflate the landuse data I have with the landuse data already on the map, and in this case I didn't see this particular issue before uploading.

Thanks for the feedback.

Hi,

The typo was fixed before I could get to it.
changeset/138462166

can you provide any specific examples? all the objects labeled intermittent ponds that I saw appeared to be lower elevation places that I assume fill with water in times of heavy rain.

Thanks,
--SherbetS

thanks!

Hi zluuzki,

Please provide a link/name the sources you use when referencing external data like this. Other users need to know where the data comes from as well.

Thanks,
SherbetS

thanks!

Hi Charles,

lostlost has been helping me with the import, and I've given strict oversight over all work he's conducted.

Hello tyfi,

On this object, node/10820829745

you used the tag man_made=communciations_tower, when the correct tagging for the object is man_made=mast. please consider this in future edits

Thanks,
-SherbetS

fixed.

changeset/136139994

will fix when I get home.

-SherbetS

I need to start having two JOSM intances, one for each account smh.

wrong account.

Hi DeerCat,

Please read up on how the OSM community defines cities:

place=city

I don't feel this definition applies to these objects, so I'm undoing your changeset.

Thank you for your contributions and interest in the map,
-SherbetS

Hello 19timber96,

Please do not tag protected areas and managed boundaries with landuse=forest just to color the map. this is incorrect and doesn’t accurately represent all areas within the area.

I’ve noticed that you’ve done this to other management areas. Can you repair this data for me? I’m not at my computer right now.

—SherbetS

thanks!