Hi! Are you sure that historic=monument is accurate description of way/1104506426 ? Seems more like tourism=artwork to me

Hi!

I am going to delete this node. It seems to be a mistake.

It is located within already existing relation/11191111 "Parque Vale do Leça"

Hi! I checked your latest changesets and it seems you always use "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal - 25 cm - 2018 (DGT)" imagery layer when performing your edits. Have you seen, that there is layer switcher in iD editor? And "Bing Maps Aerial" higher resolution and just about 2 years old - much more recent than "Orthophotos of mainland Portugal". I recommend you try it out. Mapping with such clear imagery is much more fun! And allows making more precise edits.

Hello!

It seems to me you have used "name" tags incorrectly in this change. This cemetery does not actually has a name.

See osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_use_name_tag_to_describe_things (section "Don't use name tag to describe things") and osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only (section "Name is the name only").

I am going to remove name here

heritage:website link is broken now( Maybe you know current working link?

Hi

I am going to move specie name to species=* tag . I think "name" should not be used for it.

Hi! Are you sure that way/1391567003 is a parking area? Do you have other sources besides bing aerial imagery? Does not look like car parking space to me on bing imagery.

Hello!

This changeset is problematic. It several buildings on top of existing ones. For instance, way/1305386992 is located in the same place where building relation/8889531 already present.

Another one way/1305387001 even should not be a building! There is water body there way/640937775

It seems that this changeset was produced by some kind of automation. Please do not upload other changes from the same tool without manual verification.

Olá!

Was any reason why way/1307028817/history was access=no? Looks like accidental mistake.

👋 Welcome to OpenStreetMap contributors!

This was your first edit and you made some accidentally made some unintended changes. Particularly I would like to point out:
- changing landuse of way/448744867 from farmland to leisure park. Indeed farmland was not a correct type, but park in my opinion is even more incorrect. This should be landuse=allotments (see landuse=allotments )
- You set name of construction area way/1267795895 to "Parque Urbano de Requesende". That is also incorrect for this area: they do not build park, they build apartments building.

Though you are right that this area is quite poorly represented and needs work. I am going to improve it soon. Would you like to review my edits when they are done and comment them based on your local knowledge?

Hi!

This changeset merges two sections of allotments that are actually separated. So I splitted them back and made a multipolygon: relation/19100199

Also I am not sure that "Horta de Paranhos" is the name of this horta. Horta de Paranhos seems to be in another place as per this article https://ambiente.cm-porto.pt/hortas/horta-de-paranhos

Olá! Bem-vindo aos contribuidores do OpenStreetMap!

Notei que esta é uma das suas primeiras alterações, e foi feita de uma forma bastante incomum. Foram removidas informações úteis como:

landuse=orchard

leaf_cycle=deciduous

leaf_type=broadleaved

trees=kiwi_plants

e adicionados muitos caminhos com um estilo pouco convencional.

Poderia, por favor, descrever a motivação para esta alteração? Tem alguma fonte que confirme que este terreno já não é utilizado como pomar? E qual é o objetivo de adicionar tantos caminhos?

Obrigado pela sua colaboração!

=========

Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap contributors!

This is one of your first changes, and it has been made in a highly unusual style. It removes useful information:

landuse=orchard

leaf_cycle=deciduous

leaf_type=broadleaved

trees=kiwi_plants

and adds lots of paths in an unconventional style.

Could you describe the motivation for this change? Do you have sources confirming that this land is no longer used as an orchard? Also, what is the purpose of tagging so many paths?

👋

Why have you added name "Passadiço" to the way here?

I think it goes against good practices: osm.wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer (see scetions "Don't map for the render" and "Don't use name tag to describe things"). Basically this way boils down to
bridge=boardwalk , probably surface=wood for extra details, but "Passadiço" is not a name.

I am going to delete these names from adjacent walkways

Hello! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In this changeset you you have added name=Kiosk for two nodes:

node/12281564755
node/6886954185

This is not correct. Most likely you should have used tag shop=kiosk.

Please check osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Imported node node/9537692779 duplicates already existing statue node/2518620995

I am going to merge them.

Ah sorry.

Though I was there a couple of days ago and have not noticed replica near the dovecot building. Probably they moved it?

Also it is really looks like this is an accidentally duplicated node.

If you are sure that is indeed another replica, adding note=* or description=* tag with human readable explanation of what it is and why it is distinct might help.

I suppose this change added node node/10941887433 by mistake. Which duplicates node/3906378865 and is placed in the wrong location

Well, I t does not look like parking either, so I just delete the way under question

Hello

Way you have changed way/474655380 to the military=nuclear_explosion_site in this changeset? This looks like a error to me, I revert this.

Hi. You have created a duplicate in your changeset.

You created node/11171561337 but it was already present in OSM as node/3739018875

I delete you node.