No worries

Partially reverted in 121002015 to bring back the suburb label as a member of the relation
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120978931

Hi & welcome

I see you're using the web editor (known as iD) - you can square corners of a shape by pressing "Q" when you have it selected
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120725047

Reverted in changeset/116846451

Reverted in changeset/116846451

Hi - this is not the correct way to map Wolstenholme and Endeavour streets. It makes routing a direct line impossible. They were correct the way they were originally
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116743508

Hi & welcome, you can use the "square corners" action in iD to make houses have right-angle corners

I don't see any evidence that the areas you created in the top right exist?
If you're just testing use osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing to not create live data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114039355

The boundary you traced was from aerials taken just after a flood period. Given this stretch of land is part of the Maitland Flood Mitigation Scheme, it seems like a rather arbitrary polygon?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113950525

Is using natural=wood for a single tree valid? I've always seen people against it. RE: Park at Barrack street
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113356955

Hi, when drawing building outlines make sure to use the 'square corners' function so they align with real life!
Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112675401

You accidentally(?) added access=no and removed bicycle access
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112524631

Hi, these are looking really good!
You shouldn't have `name=unnamed`, you can do `noname=yes` instead.
noname=yes

Hi, why did you remove the highway tags off way/173543920 ?

What is the reasoning for removing the unmarked crossing tags? By design they are a crossing and they are unmarked, so I am confused as to why you have done this
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111897911

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111850229

Hi - you marked the water crossing as a ford when from aerial imagery it looks like a bridge. Is this correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111473745

Correction - the Melbee street restriction is also redundant. I misread it.
The left-only onto the oneway=yes road was already catered for

Hi nicholbe, looks good! The left-turn-only restriction on Alexandra Ave roundabout is redundant though, as it's at the convergence of 2 one-way roads.
Thanks for the Melbee Street restriction, I must have forgotten to add that one myself
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109838418

Hi, using the word "details" in every changeset doesn't allude to what you have done. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments