OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
109199939 over 4 years ago

Hi - you don't need to delete and recreate objects just to reshape them, please see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109199939

102852200 over 4 years ago

Resolved in 108516054
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102852200

107171634 over 4 years ago

Hi, welcome to OSM!
The crossing looks good. For the bridge, you accidentally marked it as having 0 lanes (i.e. not traversable).
Should it be 2 lanes? (one forward, one backward)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107171634

107009210 over 4 years ago

What did you use to align these buildings? I can't match them to any aerial imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107009210

106238147 over 4 years ago

Appears reverted

106032387 over 4 years ago

Hi, there's no physical separation around way/952324038, so it probably shouldn't have been a separate way from 952324032
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106032387

105878874 over 4 years ago

Looks good. It was my understand that 'Tags such as addr:country=*, addr:city=* are often redundant as features inside administrative boundaries (when mapped) "inherit" their attributes'. Though it's not strictly incorrect to have them
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105878874

105413409 over 4 years ago

I would say it's a reduction in information, given footway=sidewalk is an approved tag. See footway=sidewalk
("also known as a footpath in Australia")

105413409 over 4 years ago

Hi - is there a reason you are removing the sidewalk tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105413409

105395185 over 4 years ago

How did you determine these are fords?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105395185

105392187 over 4 years ago

Hi. When aligning buildings, you're meant to align to the footprint on the ground, not the sky. (the imagery you used is skewed and misaligned)
Please use DCS NSW Imagery in this area for checking alignment
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105392187

105195993 over 4 years ago

Hi, you accidentially dragged a fence 200m west in this changeset. I have reverted that particular error in changeset/105198996
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105195993

105058327 over 4 years ago

Hi, do you mean this dataset by TfNSW? I can't find one by the name you listed. https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/speed-zones

104989748 over 4 years ago

Hi! Pressing 'Q' when a building is selected will square its corners
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104989748

105057997 over 4 years ago

`layer=-1` on way/945320472 doesn't seem correct. That's implying it's underground, no?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105057997

105006207 over 4 years ago

You left some construction tags on roads when removing the highway=construction

99865889 over 4 years ago

Fixed issue in 104876355 where the bridge got disconnected from the road

104769258 over 4 years ago

Looks good RE: not putting the lowered kerbs on the footway but instead the crossing way (for people not using the crossing to not get the kerb), but you missed doing that for node/8695766576
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104769258

104575792 over 4 years ago

Hi, that source link does not work. So I can't tell if we're able to use that information or not, depends on the copyright.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104575792

104478969 over 4 years ago

Ensuring the refs are populated for building codes. "UON" is not strictly the name of the university, but there may be an applicable tag for the area as a whole.
The problem you're trying to solve sounds like an issue with the search program you are using instead of the tags themselves.