ScottWalkerAU's Comments

Changeset	When	Comment
98908060	almost 5 years ago	Hi, for completeness you can mark the node where the crossing and residential road meet as an unmarked crossing as well. (not overly important for unmarked crossings, but if it were marked it means road traffic will know about the crossing, and routers may take that into account) Also good to see you're not connecting the footpaths/roads to the landuse! --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98908060
98837822	almost 5 years ago	Nice! I was meaning to do this one, wasn't sure of geometry though. --- #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98837822
98773778	almost 5 years ago	Hi, alignment on all of these building imports are incorrect. Please use DCS NSW Imagery for NSW alignment. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98773778
98676953	almost 5 years ago	Would this technically be a driveway instead of an unclassified road? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98676953
98612575	almost 5 years ago	That makes sense then. I didn't see anything on your profile so didn't assume you worked for them. If I did a wiki search I would have figured that part out. The TfNSW GTFS data was from here: https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/timetables-complete-gtfs. I imagine if I pulled it down again today I would see the change. All good :)
98437759	almost 5 years ago	Resolved in 98628064
98442838	almost 5 years ago	Resolved in changeset/98627396
98612575	almost 5 years ago	What is the source for the bus stop name changes? You haven't listed a source at all. The latest TfNSW GTFS data still shows the previous names. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98612575
98466433	almost 5 years ago	Is P7 no longer staff parking? You added access=yes, implying no permit required --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98466433
98442838	almost 5 years ago	For this one I think the correct fix would have been to mark the footways as bridges, as the stream doesn't seem to fit the definition of a culvert to me: tunnel=culvert --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98442838
98437759	almost 5 years ago	Hi, `layer=-1` implies that the building is underground. The correct resolution to the iD warning would be to mark the ways as covered for the section they go through the building --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98437759
98434786	almost 5 years ago	Hi! Just letting you know phone numbers should be using E.164 (I don't think spaces matter), e.g. +612 4955 8525 --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98434786
98335140	almost 5 years ago	Hi, you deleted a basketball court to expand a second one to cover both. It's recommended to tag them individually as they are indeed distinct courts. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98335140
98329208	almost 5 years ago	Confirming buildings are in the process of being demolished
98329137	almost 5 years ago	Confirming library is closed for good
97932280	almost 5 years ago	Confirmed with Mapillary imagery. Interesting how DCS NSW Base Map says it's Albert Street.
97629249	almost 5 years ago	Hi - you should either map the steps along the way, or tag it as wheelchair=no, else routers will try to use it for mobility impaired users. --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97629249
97594783	almost 5 years ago	Minus the 4 conflate comment. I hit delete but JOSM didn't remove the text.
97520465	almost 5 years ago	Ahoy, should it be Creek not Cgreek? --- Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97520465
97204076	almost 5 years ago	Hi, you deleted the address data along with the node. I would have expected the removal of business data, leaving address data behind.