See also: osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Australian_Shared_Path_.28bicycle_and_pedestrian_sign.29

Hi - I see bicycle=permissive on a lot of your new paths. If these are marked as shared paths (sign R8-2) they should be cycleways. See osm.wiki/Bicycle_and_pedestrian_tagging_in_Australia
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97231292

Confused how you managed to get 205 deletions for a name change
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96951657

Ah, nice timing then! I saw they were missing and none of the newest imagery had them as done

Can't tell which imagery you aligned to - but DCS is generally more accuarate than any of the other sources
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96221318

Bridge looks good - should the middle also be marked as a bridge or at least layer 1? (same for the ends)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95839399

Shouldn't multiple sources be delimited with semi-colons instead of plus signs? re: changeset source
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95836677

Maxar imagery isn't very well aligned in NSW.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91159865

It should be noted that the DCS imagery was taken during the 2015 flood period, so water levels may be off.

Hi! Is Ivy Street one-way in only? Noticed it when looking at the traffic light changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95323712

Hi! Some suggestions for this:
Try not to glue paths to suburb boundaries (they're not something physical so it doesn't make sense).
You should continue the path to the right to glue to the existing path, so it becomes routable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95287044

This is not okay. You should not be modifying highways because your systems external can't handle something.

This is not okay.

Flush means that the entire guttering is also level with the road. That does not appear to be the case. See the first image example here for lowered: kerb=*

You accidentally generalised a crossing from zebra down to "marked". Zebra is more specific.
Also "flush" kerbs are level with the roadway, perhaps you wanted to tag them as "lowered"? Looks like there's a raised gutter from the imagery.
Looks good though!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94232167

Was this meant to be "Laverty Pathology"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94170181

Are the zebra crossings you deleted no longer zebras? You only have them as "marked" now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94138332

You have lots of different overlapping multipolygons here. I see you've tried over 20 times to fix it, might pay to remove the one-member relations and start fresh
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94092199

Hi! I try to avoid connecting features to administrative boundaries as one is physical and the other is more of a concept https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/398674342
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93960133

Fixed a mistake in changeset/93893921