Hi - their website does not list an address and it does not seem this is a physical store? If it's a private residence it must not be mapped as a shop.

Were the refs on traffic lights meant to be removed?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152671037

Hi & welcome!

When drawing buildings it's recommended to use the "square corners" feature (Q on the web editor) so they draw with near 90 degree corners. (Obviously some buildings don't follow this, but most do)

For address tags, you only need the street name & house numbers as the rest can be implied from their location. (The extra tags aren't wrong, just unnecessary)

I also note that one of your buildings isn't labelled as one, it's just an area (way/1280972353)

Hi - we can't use Google maps (or street view) as a source for OSM, if that's what you're implying you used in your changeset comment.
However, I have verified on the street that it does say "Place". I will update the other parts of this street that you missed.

Thanks! I've updated the access tag for cars to be more correct & prevent vehicle routing. Foot & bicycle are still "yes"

Hi - please see this section about the footway=sidewalk tag for use in Australia:
osm.wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Cycling_and_Foot_Paths#Footpaths_(Sidewalks)

Hi, please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
All of your recent changesets in the area use the same comment and are therefore meaningless.

Hi, you accidentally removed the highway tag from Anna Place

Hi - this intersection is still closed given the construction work opposite. North side can go straight on. South side cannot pass onto north side. (Maxar has latest imagery with orange barriers)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123108947

Howdy - Instead of just deleting, you could have split the way and marked the deleted part as a private unnamed driveway
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122196327

Sounds good :)

Why did you delete the residential area?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121271680

You labelled way/1060226297 as a house when it's actually a pool, FYI

PS, you really only need addr:housenumber and addr:street as the other addr:* fields can be inferred from the encompassing suburb relation
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121007199

No worries

Partially reverted in 121002015 to bring back the suburb label as a member of the relation
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120978931

Hi & welcome

I see you're using the web editor (known as iD) - you can square corners of a shape by pressing "Q" when you have it selected
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120725047

Reverted in changeset/116846451

Reverted in changeset/116846451

Hi - this is not the correct way to map Wolstenholme and Endeavour streets. It makes routing a direct line impossible. They were correct the way they were originally
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116743508

Hi & welcome, you can use the "square corners" action in iD to make houses have right-angle corners