I don't see any evidence that the areas you created in the top right exist?
If you're just testing use osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing to not create live data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114039355

The boundary you traced was from aerials taken just after a flood period. Given this stretch of land is part of the Maitland Flood Mitigation Scheme, it seems like a rather arbitrary polygon?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113950525

Is using natural=wood for a single tree valid? I've always seen people against it. RE: Park at Barrack street
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113356955

Hi, when drawing building outlines make sure to use the 'square corners' function so they align with real life!
Thanks
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112675401

You accidentally(?) added access=no and removed bicycle access
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112524631

Hi, these are looking really good!
You shouldn't have `name=unnamed`, you can do `noname=yes` instead.
noname=yes

Hi, why did you remove the highway tags off way/173543920 ?

What is the reasoning for removing the unmarked crossing tags? By design they are a crossing and they are unmarked, so I am confused as to why you have done this
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111897911

Looks good!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111850229

Hi - you marked the water crossing as a ford when from aerial imagery it looks like a bridge. Is this correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111473745

Correction - the Melbee street restriction is also redundant. I misread it.
The left-only onto the oneway=yes road was already catered for

Hi nicholbe, looks good! The left-turn-only restriction on Alexandra Ave roundabout is redundant though, as it's at the convergence of 2 one-way roads.
Thanks for the Melbee Street restriction, I must have forgotten to add that one myself
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109838418

Hi, using the word "details" in every changeset doesn't allude to what you have done. osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi - you don't need to delete and recreate objects just to reshape them, please see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109199939

Resolved in 108516054
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102852200

Hi, welcome to OSM!
The crossing looks good. For the bridge, you accidentally marked it as having 0 lanes (i.e. not traversable).
Should it be 2 lanes? (one forward, one backward)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107171634

What did you use to align these buildings? I can't match them to any aerial imagery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107009210

Appears reverted

Hi, there's no physical separation around way/952324038, so it probably shouldn't have been a separate way from 952324032
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106032387

Looks good. It was my understand that 'Tags such as addr:country=*, addr:city=* are often redundant as features inside administrative boundaries (when mapped) "inherit" their attributes'. Though it's not strictly incorrect to have them
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105878874