ScottWalkerAU's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 104478969 | over 4 years ago | Hi,
As for suburb and state, they are inherited from boundary relations - so not strictly required.
|
| 104083914 | over 4 years ago | Hi, OSM is not a playground for you to test your software. Please don't constantly change tags on a way. The road itself has no access restrictions - it is the lift gate that has access restrictions. |
| 104083849 | over 4 years ago | Hi, please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments |
| 104017747 | over 4 years ago | Resolved issues from this in 104037858 & 104034198 |
| 104017747 | over 4 years ago | Is the area actually retail? Looks residential to me.
|
| 103984008 | over 4 years ago | Hi, footway=access_aisle may be what you're after in the parking lot.
|
| 103330559 | over 4 years ago | Pedestrian area looks good now - I fixed up the crossings at NE roundabout in 103372947
|
| 103157790 | over 4 years ago | This has been resolved |
| 103300776 | over 4 years ago | It's name is probably just "Mobil" as it was originally. It's designated as a petrol station by `amenity=fuel`
|
| 103239500 | over 4 years ago | Did the guidance on needing footways inside pedestrian areas change to be no longer required?
|
| 103146938 | over 4 years ago | Hi, the comment you left is different to what you actually did (which was add 1 new path).
|
| 103157790 | over 4 years ago | Hi, please use `addr:housenumber` instead of `name`.
|
| 102906270 | over 4 years ago | Hi, layer=-1 on that church seems incorrect. You can connect the path to the building with an entrance tag instead.
|
| 102852200 | over 4 years ago | Hi, none of the roads you added connect to the existing road network.
|
| 102851828 | over 4 years ago | Hi, roads added here clash with changeset/102852034 |
| 102768872 | over 4 years ago | I have fixed this. |
| 102768872 | over 4 years ago | Hi, use addr:housenumber instead of "name=Num 6". Similarly for surrounding houses.
|
| 102471391 | over 4 years ago | Most recent imagery (~3 months old) does not show any buildings of that size.
|
| 102458863 | over 4 years ago | Fair enough, didn't see that one. I guess there's no standard consensus because the rest of NSW is mapped on suburb boundaries. |
| 101892497 | almost 5 years ago | Hi, looks nice but please note that glueing landuse to roads is almost always incorrect
|