ScottWalkerAU's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 109199939 | over 4 years ago | Hi - you don't need to delete and recreate objects just to reshape them, please see osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
|
| 102852200 | over 4 years ago | Resolved in 108516054
|
| 107171634 | over 4 years ago | Hi, welcome to OSM!
|
| 107009210 | over 4 years ago | What did you use to align these buildings? I can't match them to any aerial imagery
|
| 106238147 | over 4 years ago | Appears reverted |
| 106032387 | over 4 years ago | Hi, there's no physical separation around way/952324038, so it probably shouldn't have been a separate way from 952324032
|
| 105878874 | over 4 years ago | Looks good. It was my understand that 'Tags such as addr:country=*, addr:city=* are often redundant as features inside administrative boundaries (when mapped) "inherit" their attributes'. Though it's not strictly incorrect to have them
|
| 105413409 | over 4 years ago | I would say it's a reduction in information, given footway=sidewalk is an approved tag. See footway=sidewalk
|
| 105413409 | over 4 years ago | Hi - is there a reason you are removing the sidewalk tag?
|
| 105395185 | over 4 years ago | How did you determine these are fords?
|
| 105392187 | over 4 years ago | Hi. When aligning buildings, you're meant to align to the footprint on the ground, not the sky. (the imagery you used is skewed and misaligned)
|
| 105195993 | over 4 years ago | Hi, you accidentially dragged a fence 200m west in this changeset. I have reverted that particular error in changeset/105198996
|
| 105058327 | over 4 years ago | Hi, do you mean this dataset by TfNSW? I can't find one by the name you listed. https://opendata.transport.nsw.gov.au/dataset/speed-zones |
| 104989748 | over 4 years ago | Hi! Pressing 'Q' when a building is selected will square its corners
|
| 105057997 | over 4 years ago | `layer=-1` on way/945320472 doesn't seem correct. That's implying it's underground, no?
|
| 105006207 | over 4 years ago | You left some construction tags on roads when removing the highway=construction |
| 99865889 | over 4 years ago | Fixed issue in 104876355 where the bridge got disconnected from the road |
| 104769258 | over 4 years ago | Looks good RE: not putting the lowered kerbs on the footway but instead the crossing way (for people not using the crossing to not get the kerb), but you missed doing that for node/8695766576
|
| 104575792 | over 4 years ago | Hi, that source link does not work. So I can't tell if we're able to use that information or not, depends on the copyright.
|
| 104478969 | over 4 years ago | Ensuring the refs are populated for building codes. "UON" is not strictly the name of the university, but there may be an applicable tag for the area as a whole.
|