Saikat Maiti's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 168450863 | 6 months ago | Hello Sikhah Arum, Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I would request you to follow the community editing guideline when you upload the changesets. Please add appropriate comments that represent your edits/changes in the data. Ref: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
|
| 147198473 | almost 2 years ago | Hi jotoga, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap (India). You have added a few buildings which are overlapping with each other. Please try your best to avoid any overlapping building polygon.
Happy Mapping! |
| 147128425 | almost 2 years ago | Hi oxygenre, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have found that you deleted many buildings which are visible from Satellite Imagery and re-added a few, rather than deleting it, you can use the same polygon and modify it correctly.
Learn more about the OpenStreetMap editing here (https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/)
|
| 147096420 | almost 2 years ago | Hi sayanstr, Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. I have updated a few highway classifications after your edits. It would be great if you explore more about the highway classification guidelines of OpenStreetMap.(highway=secondary_link; osm.wiki/India/Tags/Highway) Keep contributing and Happy Mapping! |
| 146429982 | almost 2 years ago | Hi kavig, thank you for your contribution to the OpenStreetMap. Please check the configuration near node/11530067525. Based on this junction configuration, anyone driving on way/1240936197 can never reach way/232285879. Please consider the overall routing impact when you're adding dual carriageways. Adding to it, please partition the way where it is needed when you're adding oneway=yes tag on a highway. You have added the oneway=yes tag for the entire highway (way/43967828), but after node/2406465841 it is irrelevant to have the oneway tag. |
| 138844728 | over 2 years ago | Please do not refer to Gmaps and Waze for mapping in OpenStreetMap. osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F Happy Mapping!
|
| 85099319 | over 2 years ago | Hello Ajeng Sharietta,
Building: building=* Happy Mapping! |
| 130364025 | about 3 years ago | Thanks for making these updates. Please learn more about the intersection modeling here.
I hope this will help. |
| 130363710 | about 3 years ago | Hi Pooja,
- Saikat |
| 130364025 | about 3 years ago | Hi Pooja,
This highway (way/102784452) - is not merging at node/664472032, there is a physical barrier.
- Saikat |
| 125983064 | about 3 years ago | Please find the policy of adding landuse=residential in OSM Wiki (landuse=residential). The complete admin boundary can not be a residential landuse for Kolkata.
|
| 109341947 | over 4 years ago | Could you please explain your recent edits? Why are you deleting valid information from the map and what is the goal behind your mapping? Please follow the OSM India community guideline before deleting mapped features.
|
| 106061032 | over 4 years ago | Thank you for your mapping effort. Please download the existing data before start adding new data.
|
| 100844903 | almost 5 years ago | Would you like to specify your edits? There is no level_crossing (Example: node/7661266554) exist for Kolkata Tramline and you completely messed up the topology!
|
| 91563294 | about 5 years ago | Hey Raj87, Please use street-level photo to update such details and feel free to capture photos :). lit=no (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=17.436483071287128&lng=78.36249501584155&z=17.433196919063935&pKey=DbgYcCppqRkIODr81-WvjQ&focus=photo&x=0.49144138474638516&y=0.5811264558940794&zoom=0) and maxspeed=100 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=17.437572917920544&lng=78.36300605539938&z=17&pKey=8wMs1SP9APMFb8eADm5XOQ&focus=photo) for way/55821285/history, way/378333807/history.
|
| 87228784 | over 5 years ago | Adding to Heinz_V's point, everything is documented here (osm.wiki/India/Rivers). Adding multipolygon=river_basn is not making any sense here. If I consider your point that community members should get it through the overpass or taginfo, mappers will look for "river_basin" not "river_basn". |
| 39535556 | about 7 years ago | @PlaneMad
|
| 39535556 | about 7 years ago | I would like to say that it is a castle. Because it is surrounded by man made water tank and only two small bridges are there to reach this place.
|
| 63220645 | about 7 years ago | @Ryzen First of all, I am not a paid mapper till now, what I contribute to OSM, completely with my personal interest and i love to do that. I helped others to organize mapathon freely and try to encourage map. I assured the Data working group that i will visit all the tasks done on the mapathon day because i care about OpenStreetMap data and it's uses. |
| 60164231 | over 7 years ago | Please refer this page before changing the name.
|