SK53's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 46927629 | over 7 years ago | Vous avez ajouté deux tags - fishing_water_type et fishing_domain. Dans le wiki je ne peux pas trouver le sens de ces ettiquettes. Pouvais vous precisier les un peu, s.v.p. |
| 29493673 | over 7 years ago | Ones where I could see the green sign from the car, but couldn't read the lettering IIRC. One might be able to make a guess from old maps (bridleways usually shown as a double dotted line), or just possibly geograph images (although this one shows pretty much the view I had from the car http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4047579). We need to persuade Adam2 to come via Gainsborough to Bawtry when he does one of his Mapillary drives. |
| 60815042 | over 7 years ago | Hi, Good to see you adding buildings in the centre of Lynn. In order to say that a building is a shop you dont need to say shop=yes, but can use building=retail. The presence of shops as nodes and shop=yes on the buildings means that the shops are effectively there twice. I dont know if it is possible in iD (the online editor), but some editors allow the tags from a node to be merged on to the building way. I only had a weekend here when I was mainly doing something else so I only added shops as nodes. Regards, Jerry (aka SK53) |
| 46379191 | over 7 years ago | Hi Kev, Can I ping you to check again on the status of what used to @d2? Just trawling through the history of edits to Nottingham pubs & this stands out as open, but without a name. Cheers, Jerry |
| 10713143 | over 7 years ago | I'm still not sure about type=bridge, must send an email to the tagging list |
| 53620317 | over 7 years ago | Walton Dam a micropub I think, but like Chesterfield Alehouse not tagged as such. |
| 55242250 | over 7 years ago | Far for me to make a decision, but Walton looks rather more like a suburb than a village. I see it was originally mapped as a village by JonS way back when. |
| 60110265 | over 7 years ago | I'm not sure if you realised when you added a relation for the River Thames as natural=water that you also affected a long-existing relation tagged waterway=riverbank which did the same thing. Consequently some islands are now under water. |
| 10713143 | over 7 years ago | Hi Brian, No idea if relation type=bridge is at all meaningful these days (does anything consume it?), but also the ways in the relation making up the viaduct into Moor Street dont join up). Jerry |
| 60995267 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029402 |
| 61001454 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029402 |
| 60995391 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029402 |
| 60999197 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029402 |
| 60999839 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029402 |
| 61000248 | over 7 years ago | Now reverted changeset/61029402 |
| 60994427 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029402 |
| 61001602 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029094 |
| 61001712 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029094 |
| 61016289 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029094 |
| 61017390 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/61029094 |