OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175451719 16 days ago

Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox.

174608641 about 1 month ago

revert this please

174608641 about 1 month ago

exactly, subareas are basically useless

168584782 about 1 month ago

West of US 85 it's a bit confusing too, just updated that as well: changeset/174469148

168584782 about 1 month ago

Note that the county road relations were determined to only be needed where the pentagon signs are (mainly along I-25) since everything else is streetblades. See network=US:CO:Weld which I updated to reflect the discussion.

168584782 about 1 month ago

So when I was investigating the area, I noticed that the addresses along that road were all "14th Street" so that's what I set the 'name' as. Did some further investigation this morning and found streetblade signage for County Road 14 1/2 so I added a segment after the last driveway: changeset/174463722

144458831 3 months ago

Thanks! I did end up updating it, think when I added it in I was going off of the developer's signs which were obviously wrong

144458831 3 months ago

Last time I checked, the sign said East 20th, but they could have adjusted it since I last visited Wahoo. Is there a way you can put me in touch with them directly? I'm curious about addressing and road names at the city limits and would like to discuss that with them, this would serve as a good starting point.

172076645 3 months ago

the Pierre one is hard to see with the lighting

https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=44.367716~-100.352744&lvl=16.4&pi=0.5&style=x&dir=284

172076645 3 months ago

https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=45.574446~-100.485079&lvl=17.2&style=x&pi=-10.3&dir=198.5

172076645 3 months ago

Yeah they are, don't know why SDDOT signed it that way

169751293 4 months ago

Also I noticed that you deleted some "name" tags where there were multiple names. Please do not do this.

169751293 5 months ago

see relation/19328507 for a "finished" example, I was just planning on only having route relations for the signed portions of the CRs. Also, I think the conclusion was reached that route relations don't need a name if they have a signed ref

169751293 5 months ago

So the reason I've been deleting the Weld CR Relations is that the vast majority of them are not signed with pentagons (as opposed to Larimer), and the relation doesn't give any more information than is given in the name tag. I tried to do a "signed/unsigned" distinction similar to how US 85 is, but that just didn't work very well

168767491 5 months ago

also thank you!

168767491 5 months ago

Last time I looked most of the letters had peeled off, it was more substantial 11 years ago

168767491 5 months ago

Don't know, just copied the label that was on it

168767491 5 months ago

In my defense I don't think that tag existed 11 years ago (or I didn't look then)

168767491 5 months ago

Hey, it looks like this could have been re-tagged with a better tagging scheme instead of deleted (amenity=public_bookcase). Could this be reverted please?

168666744 5 months ago

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498

Please join!