SD Mapman's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175451719 | 16 days ago | Thanks! Missing the plain dirt areas out by Mirror (no good tag) and I still haven't got around to doing the landuse out by Cox. |
| 174608641 | about 1 month ago | revert this please |
| 174608641 | about 1 month ago | exactly, subareas are basically useless |
| 168584782 | about 1 month ago | West of US 85 it's a bit confusing too, just updated that as well: changeset/174469148 |
| 168584782 | about 1 month ago | Note that the county road relations were determined to only be needed where the pentagon signs are (mainly along I-25) since everything else is streetblades. See network=US:CO:Weld which I updated to reflect the discussion. |
| 168584782 | about 1 month ago | So when I was investigating the area, I noticed that the addresses along that road were all "14th Street" so that's what I set the 'name' as. Did some further investigation this morning and found streetblade signage for County Road 14 1/2 so I added a segment after the last driveway: changeset/174463722 |
| 144458831 | 3 months ago | Thanks! I did end up updating it, think when I added it in I was going off of the developer's signs which were obviously wrong |
| 144458831 | 3 months ago | Last time I checked, the sign said East 20th, but they could have adjusted it since I last visited Wahoo. Is there a way you can put me in touch with them directly? I'm curious about addressing and road names at the city limits and would like to discuss that with them, this would serve as a good starting point. |
| 172076645 | 3 months ago | the Pierre one is hard to see with the lighting https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=44.367716~-100.352744&lvl=16.4&pi=0.5&style=x&dir=284 |
| 172076645 | 3 months ago | https://www.bing.com/maps/?cp=45.574446~-100.485079&lvl=17.2&style=x&pi=-10.3&dir=198.5 |
| 172076645 | 3 months ago | Yeah they are, don't know why SDDOT signed it that way |
| 169751293 | 4 months ago | Also I noticed that you deleted some "name" tags where there were multiple names. Please do not do this. |
| 169751293 | 5 months ago | see relation/19328507 for a "finished" example, I was just planning on only having route relations for the signed portions of the CRs. Also, I think the conclusion was reached that route relations don't need a name if they have a signed ref |
| 169751293 | 5 months ago | So the reason I've been deleting the Weld CR Relations is that the vast majority of them are not signed with pentagons (as opposed to Larimer), and the relation doesn't give any more information than is given in the name tag. I tried to do a "signed/unsigned" distinction similar to how US 85 is, but that just didn't work very well |
| 168767491 | 5 months ago | also thank you! |
| 168767491 | 5 months ago | Last time I looked most of the letters had peeled off, it was more substantial 11 years ago |
| 168767491 | 5 months ago | Don't know, just copied the label that was on it |
| 168767491 | 5 months ago | In my defense I don't think that tag existed 11 years ago (or I didn't look then) |
| 168767491 | 5 months ago | Hey, it looks like this could have been re-tagged with a better tagging scheme instead of deleted (amenity=public_bookcase). Could this be reverted please? |
| 168666744 | 5 months ago | https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mountain-west-automated-road-route-road-name-changes/132498 Please join! |