Russ McD's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 79161434 | almost 6 years ago | Hi,
|
| 79161434 | almost 6 years ago | Hello Jay - My tone is one born out of frustration, so apologies if it sounded harsh. Your intent to lead traffic out of the cities, should not cause you to change the status of roads. This can be achieved to a certain degree by adding the correct speed limits and not changing the classification tag.
|
| 79161434 | almost 6 years ago | And you have changed the unclassified frontage roads to primary_links on one side of the Hwy 210, but not on the other.
|
| 79161434 | almost 6 years ago | Furthermore, I see you cud not even be bothered to change the U-turns and links to match the new status. All this does is add to workload when we run error checking programs. May I ask where else you have been arbitrarily changing roads in Thailand ? |
| 79161434 | almost 6 years ago | Jay - please respect local Thai mapping guidelines for the status of roads. We have a Wiki that explains this.
|
| 75717561 | almost 6 years ago | Dave, I took the road ref 4070 from the DRR roadnet database, and assumed it truncated the 3065 at 18.36867 98.9052.
|
| 78762567 | almost 6 years ago | Please stop editing our Map - you have deleted the Highway tag from road ฉช.4008. You either don't know what you are doing or you are destroying data on purpose. STOP NOW. |
| 77395022 | almost 6 years ago | To the mapper that changed this new road (ชร.1063) from construction status to an open highway, thanks for your efforts.
|
| 71341349 | about 6 years ago | Dear Mr Baldmaster Caleb @ Kaart : Mapping may give you a feeling of joy as you put it, but over here it brings nothing but despair....
|
| 71341788 | about 6 years ago | Dear Te-Ika /Daniel @Kaart ... way/94054580 carries the road ref ชม.4307. It ;eads to a monastery. There are very few residential houses along it. Please read and respect our local Wiki and mapping conventions and leave as we tagged it ... tertiary. I have changed it back as I have done for much of Kaarts other work in the CM area. |
| 71769300 | about 6 years ago | Kaart logic defies me ... way/203225104 - two sides the same road separated by a grass median. Its access to the University and therefore a service road. You change one side to unclassified and leave the other as service. way/449472769 - its a layby used for Red taxis to pick up Government employees. On the South side of Hwy 11, you decide it should be a trunk_link, while the identical layby on the North remains as unclassified. Why do you change roads just for the sake of change - your consistency leaves a lot to be desired ? I'll fix it just as I do all your other blunders. |
| 71703910 | about 6 years ago | I see u fixed it ... thanks. |
| 73499756 | about 6 years ago | Fixed. |
| 71703910 | about 6 years ago | Way: บ้านแม่ย่อย-สันศรี ซอย 2 (700312239) has been added as just a line, with a name.
|
| 71565400 | about 6 years ago | Thats the Changmoi Tudmai Road (way/203681410) to clarify, but is one of many. |
| 71565400 | about 6 years ago | Why has this been changed to a residential road ?
|
| 70591036 | about 6 years ago | Way History: Sridonchai Road (20409525) - The Kaart logic defies me here ....
|
| 75813788 | about 6 years ago | I fear the Chiang Mai map has now just become a battleground for the "highway status changers" ....
Then 6 months ago, a member of Kaart decided it needed to be a trunk_link.
Grab/Kaart - please take your indecisiveness elsewhere. Your efforts are becoming the laughing stock of the seasoned OSM community here.
|
| 70368233 | about 6 years ago | Perhaps you jokers in Kaart Utah can explain your rationale about the road that runs along the canal ... for 10 years this way/77848398 has been correctly tagged as an Unclassified road. Its starts at the junction with the 1096 and that's where mile-marker Zero is.
|
| 69035178 | about 6 years ago | I have sorted the mess out now. |