Rudolf Mayer's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 34077881 | about 10 years ago | Can you provide details on the golf course you created here? A name, contact details, etc..
|
| 33559216 | over 10 years ago | The initial mapper had just mapped one course, I untangled that earlier today; I now merged the driving range together with the Holtye Golf Club, thanks for your info! |
| 33559216 | over 10 years ago | I saw you tagged way/367342449 as a golf course - can you provide details to that? is it part of Hoyte golf course? |
| 33379688 | over 10 years ago | You tagged all of way/25846785 as a golf course, I removed that now - only a part of this area is a course, and that is mapped separately already... |
| 12815277 | over 10 years ago | It is marked already since some time as a node, see node/3240024505; of course it could be converted to an area |
| 12815277 | over 10 years ago | I removed the mapped course now; maybe it has been something long time ago, but from the aerial footage it just seems a bit too narrow for a course. carbrook golf club has a nice history section, and indeed the course slightly relocated, but just to the adjacent property, so i think that's also not it... |
| 28243392 | over 10 years ago | Can you please provide details for the golf course you mapped here? is this a driving range, a private hole? If it is not a golf course, please remove the tagging. |
| 33308296 | over 10 years ago | You created e.g. way/365484271 as a golf course; I am not sure what is the best option to map the artificial target greens in the water, but it is for sure not leisure=golf_course, because it is not a golf course per se. It is also not a putting green, because you can't putt there.. Maybe use man_made=pier on it, and just give it a descriptive name? In any case, please remove the golf_course mapping |
| 12815277 | over 10 years ago | You tagged way/177240763/history as a golf course; as I can't find any information on that, and the aerial footage also doesn't suggest a course, can you please check this and add a name & contact info if it is really a golf course? |
| 28044274 | over 10 years ago | Can you please provide details (name, website, ...) on the golf course that you created here: way/321325211/history |
| 32907967 | over 10 years ago | I saw that you changed this area to a golf course - do you also have a name and website for it? |
| 19442889 | over 10 years ago | As this changeset seems to have introduced the complicated mapping of the A1-B6438 intersection, please check and verify my note at note/409320 |
| 32403108 | over 10 years ago | I reverted your edits - this motorway is not yet opened, and thus shouldn't be marked as such.
|
| 31379842 | over 10 years ago | Knoten Riegersdorf ist noch nicht wirklich in Bau, in der Pressemitteilung steht 2018 als Ziel. Momentan wird eine bestehende Brücke erweitert.. => Entweder noch alls in "proposed" belassen, oder den gesamten Abschnitt 1 als under construction, nur den Knoten als under construction zu setzen spiegelt jedenfalls falsche Tatsachen wieder... |
| 30816423 | over 10 years ago | You removed a lot of useful golf & address tags from way/31960569 => can you fix that? |
| 30807880 | over 10 years ago | Are you sure that way/204364680 is a golf course? if so, please provide some details, but rather it seems it is just a park, as it was marked before.. |
| 29855472 | over 10 years ago | Can you please verify your golf course tagging? If this is really a golf course (way/335600674), please provide name & other details.
|
| 27571030 | almost 11 years ago | This changeset seems to have deleted much more than initially intended by the author, some changes might needed to be rolled back |
| 28087266 | almost 11 years ago | I undid parts of this changeset relating to Alpha Golftours. I removed the wrong tags - for sure this is not a golf course, and further, it is not an office; there might be an office at this location, among other things. but then you should create a POI, not tag the whole building... |
| 27961386 | almost 11 years ago | Thanks a lot - it is indeed very useful for offline usage.. (For me, in the chromium browser, the phone number on the contact page is *not* visible, I guess that's why I didn't find it...) |