While I agree that these tags will apply to most bicycle ways, I would still advocate for explicit tagging, instead of implicit. With implicit tagging you cannot be sure if the road is as expected, or whether alternative information just has not been added yet. There's not downside to adding more information, and not all renderers/routers will handle implied tags well.

Hello Tjuro,

I don't think I have misunderstood the road hierarchies at all, but I would love to hear your reasoning. Here's mine:
Based on the wiki, motorway_link is used for sliproads and have motorway restrictions. As these road sections are found within city bounds they cannot have motorway restrictions and thus do not qualify as any part of the motorway road hierarchy. Furthermore, as soon as the road reaches the traffic lights the way that the road is built reflects secondary road features, which motorway_link roads do not have. These include traffic lights, give ways signs (usually used by road designers to mark the end of the slipway to drivers) and footpath/cycle crossings, all features not ordinarily found on motorways or motorway_links In short, once you reach the traffic lights the traffic situation no longer represents a slipway, and should therefore get a different road classification. Besides, Motorway_link would mislead routers and renderers, as it would imply that travel among this way is uninterupted, as is expected with slipways.

As no arguments were provided, I will revert this change to adhere to the wiki.

Kind regards,
Rensco

Hallo Eggie,

Bedankt voor de tips en de feedback. Ik ging ervanuit dat gezien de plaatsnaam in de lokale taal ingevoerd moest worden, dat dit hetzelfde zou zijn voor het postcode formaat. Maar ik zal er op letten.

Mvg,
Rensco