Reemuson's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 113356955 | about 4 years ago | I would have to reconfirm the specifics of the area in regards to how many trees there are and I’ll update the map when I have the time to take a trip. |
| 104478969 | over 4 years ago | Most of the buildings were slowly being populated with building code ref tags by my changesets. Either we can revert this and future changesets or I can just go back and fix this manually. |
| 104087553 | over 4 years ago | Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data. |
| 104479951 | over 4 years ago | These changes should be rolled back, if you give confirmation I will do this for you. I have been slowly mapping the buildings of the UON campus according to the rules and guidelines layed out by the wiki, the changes you have made are contrary to these. |
| 104663432 | over 4 years ago | These changes should be rolled back, if you give confirmation I will do this for you. I have been slowly mapping the buildings of the UON campus according to the rules and guidelines layed out by the wiki, the changes you have made are contrary to these. |
| 104479951 | over 4 years ago | Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data. |
| 104663432 | over 4 years ago | Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data. |
| 103239500 | over 4 years ago | Should be sorted now. |
| 103239500 | over 4 years ago | Checking, I don't think it's changed and it appears to be recommended/required. It was an oversight on my part because I didn't have the patience to draw ways inside it as well as not fully having enough survey data to path the details. I'll be going back to survey again with more thorough GPX traces and will add them in soon. |