OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
113356955 about 4 years ago

I would have to reconfirm the specifics of the area in regards to how many trees there are and I’ll update the map when I have the time to take a trip.

104478969 over 4 years ago

Most of the buildings were slowly being populated with building code ref tags by my changesets. Either we can revert this and future changesets or I can just go back and fix this manually.

104087553 over 4 years ago

Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data.

104479951 over 4 years ago

These changes should be rolled back, if you give confirmation I will do this for you. I have been slowly mapping the buildings of the UON campus according to the rules and guidelines layed out by the wiki, the changes you have made are contrary to these.

104663432 over 4 years ago

These changes should be rolled back, if you give confirmation I will do this for you. I have been slowly mapping the buildings of the UON campus according to the rules and guidelines layed out by the wiki, the changes you have made are contrary to these.

104479951 over 4 years ago

Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data.

104663432 over 4 years ago

Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data.

103239500 over 4 years ago

Should be sorted now.

103239500 over 4 years ago

Checking, I don't think it's changed and it appears to be recommended/required.

It was an oversight on my part because I didn't have the patience to draw ways inside it as well as not fully having enough survey data to path the details.

I'll be going back to survey again with more thorough GPX traces and will add them in soon.