Hi,

I drove through here again today for work and confirmed that this is a standard new-england roundabout with a non-traversable center. I am going to re-map it as such. If you would like to discuss this or explain your reasoning for making it a mini I'd be more then happy to listen.

Thanks,
RedEyedVireo

Hi,

What was your thought process for mapping this as a mini roundabout? Did you survey it? I am just confused cos to my eye from driving though here it just seems like a standard mass roundabout with a significant (>6") raised central circle and some big rocks or something in the center similar to here for example: way/1236903792 .

Thanks,
RedEyedVireo

Hi,

If I don't get a response on this soon I am going to be left with no choice but to revert this edit as the edit to the nashua river is defiantly incorrect. I do belive that this was a mistake and if you would like help fixing this or reverting it yourself I'd be more then happy to assist.

Thanks again,
RedEyedVireo

Hi,

I don't think that the merrimack river is surrounded by beach all the way from nashua to lowell. Can you provide the reasoning and sources behind this change?

Thanks!

Excellent! Thank you.

RedEyedVireo

Hi,

I think you might want to expand the power plant grounds to include the building on the right.

I think the left building has the actual generators and the right one does some kind of processing of the fuel. Or a least that's where all the big dump trucks are being unloaded every time I drive past.

Also I was looking at wounder if there is some why of indicating a biomass storage site on OSM since these people store big piles of chipped wood for burning here: osm.org/go/ZfC9f_W0x-?m=

Let me know if you have any questions.

RedEyedVireo

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146012929.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146013425.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146012948.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146013032.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146013043.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146013050.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146013058.

This changeset has been reverted by changeset/146013067

Hello again,

It has been several days since I first contacted you about the sources for your edits since I found them to be highly unlicky to be correct

Since then I have done an internet search for changes of speed limit on I290 and MA 2. Both searches came up empty. I also checked the speed limit on I290 while I was commuting on it. The limit is still 65mph.

At this point I can state with certenty that this changeset and your others on I290 are fictional. Keeping this in mind it is highly likely that your speed limit changes on MA 2 are also fictional.

Editing of this type is defined in the OSM wiki as vandalism osm.wiki/Vandalism#Vandalism_and_other_types_of_bad_editing

This page also give me the privlage to revert edits that I can prove degrade the quality of the map data on OSM.

Therefore I am asking that you please revert the speedlimit changes back to the previous values.

If I do not get a response from you by 6PM on Sunday the 7th (tomorrow) I will revert your edits myself.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask.

RedEyedVireo

Hi and welcome to OSM!

What is the source for these changes?

I believe that there is a state law prohibiting speed limits being set over 65mph unless they have changed the law?

Thanks
RedEyedVerio

Hi,

It looks like you have inavertently added two sections of trail as a boardwalk: way/1224887969 and way/1224887970

If you could please correct this it would be appreciated.
If you have any questions feel free to ask.
RedEyedVireo

Hi,

I noticed that you changed parts of the Mass Central Rail Trail from highway=cycleway to highway=path. Since highway=path is a very generic tag that is commonly used on small hiking trails in the woods. It makes it hard for cyclists to find the rail trail on cycling maps.

For the rail trails in mass the convention is to use highway=cycleway with foot=yes so that the rail trails will show up on dedicated cycling maps but it is also indicated that walking/running is ok too.

If you could ether revert this changeset or submit a new changeset that resets the rail trail to highway=cycleway and foot=yes it would be appreciated.

I also saw that you changed ways way/229841698 and way/229841699 that were tagged with highway=bridleway to highway=path. This is fine if these are just foot paths in the woods. Plus I doubt they are restricted to horses only.

If you have any questions feel free to ask.

Thanks for your cooperation,
RedEyedVireo

Since it has been 4days since attempting to contact this mapper and there has not been any reply or further activity on OSM I just went ahead and fixed the incorrectly mapped addresses. changeset/134986732

Hello and welcome to OSM,

It looks like you tried to add addresses to this multi-family house. When adding addresses to buildings in OSM there are certain rules that need to be observed in order for that data to be useful to navigation programs and things of that nature. The complete documentation on adding addresses can be found here :addr:*=*

However, if you (like me) don't enjoy reading a bunch of boring documentation just to figure out something trivial you can use this multi-family house that I mapped as an example: way/1066702889

Let me know if you need any help or clarification.

RedEyedVireo.