malicious tag removal;
observed while investigating
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

tagging regression;
observed while investigating
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

observation while investigating
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Denmark: mass-merging of addr: nodes into building outline; against practice of the local community; apparently reverted already

mass-merging of addr: nodes into building outline; embedded in a larger CS
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
mass-fusion reverted

I have fixed the naming issue.
Leaves open the question what your source of the name was?

Hi Nikola K,
the name you added to the area is clearly wrong, the Schlossplatz is at a different place.
What source do you use for your edits, as clearly a place name cannot be visible from aerial imagery?

The revert accidentally included the following repairs:
US (LA area) 81149530 tagging erosion,
and
MX 80815342 removes feature tag from landuse relation; introduces implausible landuse w/o giving source
80815461 implausible landuse and w/o giving a source
under the same DWG ticket

malicious deletion of existing buildings
repaired
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

- deletes way/21763053 just to draw it again in similar shape

- maliciously deletes existing new buildings way/404450592 way/448332517
- deletes pond way/404450595 and redraws as 766572621
- erodes landuse tagging, a.g. landuse=industrial to area=yes
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Hi pangoSE,
just to understand what you were doing - which are the validation fixes you talk about?
What does "Review by So9q" mean in your "source:lake" tagging?
way/9653990 looks more like a pond than a lake?

implausible landuse tagging; undocumented extrapolation from node to campus (repaired/reverted)
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

blunt mechanical removal of brand:wikipedia
just an example: what was wrong with United States Post Office ?
As usual, mixed with some minor tracing.

CS was partially reverted,
reason: US: mass deletion of buildings
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Ja, nur nicht zufälligerweise sondern beabsichtigt.
observed in DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

Hi pangoSE, this gives the impression of a mechanical edit.
Could you tell us about your review methodology, decision criteria, and why you added "source:lake" to each object, instead of the changeset?

full revert in #82308503 where the comment is:

ID: full revert of 63661394 which maliciously coastlines w/o refinement or replacement; and mechanically removed landuse; DWG Ticket#2020022910000011;

ok, apparently replacing MP relations with simple polygons

mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater plants;
malicious deletion of storage tanks (restored)
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011

mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater plants
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011