Dear diary,
I'm contributing since february 2008, but never posted here. So let's give it a try.
My current town in France (Aix-En-Provence) is in progress, thanks to the work of a few OSMers. All "bicycle_rental" amenities have been taggued yet. Okay, there were just 16 (compared to the thousands in Paris) ... But I'm ready for an another goal now. I tried via the yahoo imagery to draw some buildings (including "private" / personal buildings) in the area but I don't know if it is a good idea or not. They all appear in pink on the map, and for sure this is not the priority. Perhaps should I focus on the streets (namings, oneways, ...) before trying to have a surcharged map with full of (useless ?) things.
While reading some stuffs on the net this evenning, I just fall on this : http://www.procedural.com/cityengine/features.html ; it looks like an interesting project - proprietary, but interesting anyway :-P. Relying on the webpage (and if I understand correctly), it can use OSM datas in order to make 3D views of cities (a colleague from my french school will work on her final internship on this software). But what about the licensing of the work resulting in the use of this application ? I hope to see a lot of 3D-rendered towns under creative commons. Wait and see ...
Sorry for my bad english, and see you later !
Discussion
Comment from davespod on 5 January 2009 at 21:19
Yes, the licensing question is a valid one. All work derived from OSM data must be under Creative Commons licence. Maybe this website needs to make that clear, given that its product is clearly aimed at commercial customers
Comment from Andy Allan on 6 January 2009 at 01:44
Nice to see more work on cyclemap-related stuff in France!
Comment from Pierre Mauduit on 6 January 2009 at 12:31
@Andy : the pleasure was all mine :-)
(And great job on the cyclemap by the way, congrats !)
Comment from OliverLondon on 6 January 2009 at 17:29
My impression is that one use for this software will be for architects to put a planned building into context. I think it will be hard to argue that their model is derived from OSM data, just because they placed it on an OSM base map. Lawyers can argue for ages about these things!
These diaries are quite a good way of communicating with the community...
Comment from Pierre Mauduit on 6 January 2009 at 18:00
In fact, it would be great to have some lawyers in the OSM community, but laws change from a country to another ... I read the french ML where there are threads with a billion messages about "Do we have the right to tag this / use that ... ?" (the "cadastre", the trek paths branded by the french trekking federation ...) but I am totally unskilled in this domain.