OrdinaryScarlett's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 175344030 | 17 days ago | Hi, I'm sorry to hear that my edits broke something. I was trying to update the RTD line relations to reflect the service changes post-pandemic, but it seems as if I may have unintentionally broken a lot of stuff. Please feel free to revert all of them if you need to. Here's a list of all their reversion numbers that you can just copy and paste into osm-revert (https://revert.monicz.dev/):
Again, my sincere apologies for accidentally breaking stuff. It wasn't my intention and I'll be more careful with my edits in the future. Thanks for bringing the issue to my attention. |
| 173332203 | about 2 months ago | Why did you mark the current Shands Bridge as motorway? It's not grade separated from local traffic. |
| 171696212 | 3 months ago | Hi! I was just curious how you were aware of the new segment between US 41 and US 60 opened to traffic and was designated as KY 3690? |
| 165263915 | 8 months ago | Why? US 67 isn’t being officially truncated. |
| 154447260 | over 1 year ago | Hi. I noticed you opened up the interchange between I 69 and I 465. Local sources state that the interchange is due to open next month; in August. Are there any verifiable sources proving this interchange has already opened to traffic? If not, please revert the premature edits. Thanks. |
| 145361008 | almost 2 years ago | I apologize for the incorrect edits. I made some erroneous assumptions about the area as a local. I will be more diligent about relying on sources in the future. Thank you for reverting my erroneous edit. |
| 146022913 | almost 2 years ago | I sourced them from this video here: |
| 142745798 | about 2 years ago | Done. Please feel free to check if there are still any mistakes. Again, thank you so much for pointing this out. |
| 142745798 | about 2 years ago | My apologies. Thanks for the information. I will correct my mistake. |
| 140661190 | over 2 years ago | Hi Will, I didn’t really have any specific rationale for removing “Metro” from the relation names, I just personally thought about harmonizing their names with the actual line names themselves. If it’s better for them to have “Metro” in the relation names, then I wholeheartedly support that decision and can add it back to the relation names. Thank you!
|
| 129984679 | almost 3 years ago | My apologies, I was mistaken. Thanks for letting me know! |
| 128016902 | about 3 years ago | Hi! Thanks for the comment! My sincere apologies for the mistakes and unsourced edits. Please feel free to revert/change them. |
| 127906863 | about 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for the comment! I've changed the tags. |
| 127908346 | about 3 years ago | Hi! Thanks for the comment, I removed the parentheticals. |
| 127386658 | about 3 years ago | Thanks for the comment! I've hopefully fixed the issue now. |
| 112632016 | about 4 years ago | Hi! Apologies for my incorrect changeset. I genuinely didn't realize that the interchange was only partially open to traffic. I was under the impression that the entire interchange was open to traffic because the news report I read never explicitly mentioned that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention and reverting it! |