Hi Andy,
I removed this section after I noticed there was no WVW signage on these paths, which was later confirmed by the WVW website once I got home.
These paths were in rather poor condition, so I suspect the trail was moved due to this.

Either way, it is clear that I mistakenly introduced errors in this edit.
Would it be more appropriate to return the relation back to how it was and leave a note/fixme tag, or change it to match the WVW website (I don't think this has a suitable license)?

Having looked into it further, that would make sense. The wiki stating "cars and boats" caught me out, meaning I didn't realise it also included horse saddles.
Now updated in changeset/165702757.

Hi,
This business makes accessories and equipment for horse riding.
I believe saddlery is correct in this case, but happy to be corrected if you know a more suitable tag.

Hi Tom,
I have just surveyed a post box in East Grinstead that you tagged as removed.
It IS still present, so I have reverted that part of your edit. The mapillary image that you tagged was on the incorrect road, so I have removed that tag as well.

Hi Andy,
When I surveyed this, I noted that there was signage for all three of the armed forces as tagged.
I don't have any photos retained, but Bing Streetside (and Google Streetview) shows signs for the air force and army at the enterance. (maybe the navy was a temporary sign?)
My understanding that this was the most appropriate tagging, unless there is a single tag that covers multiple elements of the MoD?
Either way, I haven't been able to confirm online that the navy is present, so I'll ether need to remove that after your response, or take a look next time I'm passing (which may be a while).

Hi Jack,
Just a heads-up that I've changed some of the areas you have mistakenly added and tagged as buildings such as this rugby club. It looks like you may have mistakenly done this a few times.
I also see some of the field boundares that you have added don't quite match up. Have you considered using OSMUK Cadastral Parcels in the ID editor?

As this edit hasn't been reverted and other AONBs/NLs have also been changed, do I assume that the name change for the Cotswolds was correct?

Hello owen4584 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It appears that you have deleted a car park which should have remained present (it is still in use as such), so I have reverted these edits in changeset/147088877.

Hello owen4584 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “ygfyuuv” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
It also appears that you have removed multiple tags to the road and waterway which should have remained present, so I have reverted these edits in changeset/147087100.
A useful tool for working out how to correctly tag objects is the Wiki (wiki.openstreetmap.org), so this is definitely worth taking a look!

Quote from the webpage: "The area will be High Weald National Landscape. Our designation is still High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty."

First one here indicates that the National Landscape is a place, not an organisation. https://highweald.org/news/introducing-the-high-weald-national-landscape/

I'm not so sure about that. Everything I have read indicates a complete rebrand, not just the governing bodies. As your correspondence with the Cotswolds was two years ago (before all other areas took the National Landscape name), could it be that this has since changed?

Apologies, that was a mistake on my part. Thank you for correcting it.

Hi Robert,
Yes, you're right. I must have made that mistake while adding buildings and addresses around the town centre. (now corrected) changeset/97332531
The rest of the tags are correct. The building used to be a pub called 'The Rose and Crown' before it was converted into three flats (some of which have also been used as retail units). The building retained the name of the pub after conversion.
All units also have the same house number, which confused me a bit as well. They're all uniquely identified/addressed by the flat number (Flat 1, 2, or 3) or the name of the business.

No, It's just a peak without a name (which also has the incorrect height).

Done!