Good edits here, nice work.

This is really useful info. I would suggest that you add a tag for the type of business, even if it is a general company office. That way it will show up on the map.

Good edits, thanks! As a hint, you can click on the building and hit the button that looks like a square, which will square all the corners to 90 degrees.

There appears to be an Asian Food Center in the same building. Is that the same store? Are you sure there is no longer a Goodwill in the building, because it still looks like there is according to their website.

Hi, thanks for the edits, but please don't name things that don't have actual names. For instance, don't name a tennis court "Tennis Court" unless it has a name like "John Doe Memorial Tennis Court" or "Court #3."

These are junk edits. Don't add things that don't exist. I will revert these edits.

Most of the the stuff is clearly made up. Unfortunately, I cannot tell what's real and what's fake. Please don't add non-existent features. Reverting.

Use address nodes. Click point/node in the editor, select address, then type in the addresses. Put them where they are on the building.

Oops, wrong account. JOSM's token system burned me.

Oops, wrong account. JOSM's token system burned me.

I have reported you to the DWG for instigating an edit war. We will let them make the final judgement. Thank you.

First, Sub_station is an outdated tag, and JOSM throws an error. I fixed those errors by hand.

Second, it was not listed on any of the talk forums or the Slack. Please point me to that thread if it exists.

Hey, glad to see some buildings going into Kent. One suggestion: use the square corner option in iD to square the corners of the buildings. To do it, just click on the building and selection the button that looks like a square. It'll make the buildings look a lot better.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Understood, but since rendering isn't consistent on all platforms (and doesn't dictate tagging), we should use the landuse tag as well.

Nevermind, looks like you did. Thanks for the work.

I'll wait, but definitely fix the broken intersection. Thanks for replacing it.

This changeset is definitely was part of the issue, since it deletes the intersection node. I'll revert unless you want to.

Something looks seriously messed up with the Kent boundary now. It also appeared to break an intersection at 42nd Avenue s, Orillia Ave, and South 212th.

Hi, thanks for the edit but this is not accurate at all. Not only is it not based on any real boundaries, much of downtown is commercial and retail landuse, not residential. Furthermore, there is also a significant amount of correct landuse in downtown Seattle. Please remove this change. Thanks.

A quick note: don't abbreviate words like lane or southeast in roads. Apps that use the data do it automatically, so it actually makes it harder to find those roads if you type "Crystal Springs Lane Southeast" in.