width=1.2 on Kurt-A.-Körber-Chaussee cannot be correct and will break routing for all cars, so I have removed it.

Thank you for fixing my mistake

Yes, look good

Please tag it as a redlight enforcement relation:

osm.wiki/Relation:enforcement#Example_1:_Simple_Redlight_camera

Is the speed cam node/11526478964

What can be seen on

https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=44.649479%7E2.213492&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&pi=2.4&style=x&dir=137.3

Because then it is a highway=speed_display

I did not create the caravan_site. It was created in 2017.

But I did update it with a link to jura-tourism. That website has a photo with a motorhome icon. I found the same place on Mapillary 2021 without the motorhome sign, but the image on the Jura tourism website has a 2022 timestamp, so I presume that the city did designate it as a motorhome stopover a couple of years ago or recognized it by putting up the sign.

Sorry. You are right. I missed that and have moved the cam back.

Yes, I have seen the website.
And if you have a separate caravansite, then that should be tagged.

But you do not have 21 caravan sites, you have at most one. Just as you have only one camp site.
One caravan site can have multiple camp_pitches. I have tried to map that.

These are not caravan sites.

I have changed it to bungalows.

Sorry, fat fingers, I must have been trying to tag maxcurrent.
fixed.

Oh, sorry.
Should P16 be tagged as "ref"?

Er du sikker på at ALDI i Haderslev Laurids Skaus Gade er blevet til en REMA 1000. Den er ikke på Remas hjemmeside. Og ifølge JV bliver det ikke en REMA 1000

https://jv.dk/haderslev/fremtiden-for-tom-aldi-butik-afsloeres-maaske-snart

Jeg cyklede forbi for en uge side.
Men jeg vil cykle forbi igen og kigge indefor.

Den ved svanemøllen blev til en COOP butik (ikke 365), men der står et skilt om at den bliver til en Superbrugsen, så det går hurtigt.

Irma Østerport station er der altså endnu.

I did not try to move it. I just wanted to use the URL with the https schema.

And I use the website tag to tag websites.

It might be a description, but it is not a name.

It it said "toilet" that does also not mean that the toilet has the name "toilet".

"Area Sosta Camper" is not a name.
It is just describing the tag.

Why is it surprising?
I agree that it is somewhat confusing.
I think that tourism=caravan_site, caravans=no is already confusing.

But that is how is was done and is documented on the wiki.
(capacity:caravans is documented on tourism=camp_site).

This not mechanial or automated changes.

According to tourism=camp_site

capacity:caravans is the number of pitches for both caravans and motorhomes.

these 4 sites are
tourism=caravan_site, caravans=0

So there are no room for caravans (trailers pulled by a car).

But we cannot use capacity:caravans=0 because then data consumers (e.g., opencampingmap) will interpret this as there is also no capacity for motorhomes.

So a site like node/11038816129

has room for 10 motorhomes and 3 caravans.

The only way I can see to confer that information is capacity:caravans=13,capacity:motorhomes=10.
Maybe we could add e.g., capacity:trailer_caravans=3

It is all a bit of a mess because the name "caravan" is used in a very ambiguous and confusing way in tagging.