you can also always add a "Fix Me" tag to anything on here that you may find questionable or suspect.

I completely appreciate the frustration, and the quality issues of strava's routing feature is a whole other thing... in this park for example, unless a trails is explicitly marked as foot traffic only, all trails are understood to be accessible to foot, bicycle, and horse. Trail visibility, or mtb:scale can better inform on what to expect for a given section.

As far as fords are concerned, water levels change, rocks move or get moved around, etc.

I've done my share of hike-a-bike in patapsco when goofing around on a gravel bike a few years ago.

Why one of the ways was marked skateboard=yes, that needs/needed to be cleand up.

I hope this clears things up for you.

the two deleted fords, for example, i have crossed within the last year.

there is definitely a trail here, it just may not be visible at the moment due to overgrowth or some other maintenance issue. i'd update the trail visibility, not delete a section that may be visible or passable during a different time of year.

So creating a different problem by trying to solve the first problem isn't really a solution to the first problem then is it?

These mass reversions are vandalizing the history/changesets for everyone who's made legitimate updates across close to half of the entire planet.

@Spalt, it's standing height, dry, and has been used since it was built in the 90's to get to the other side of the highway and to the park. Depending on time of year, the track to the west of Rt 100 is more or less visible.

+1 to @Maplev's comment from yesterday.
These reversions make it impossible to example the history of an area that I'm working on. So when edits I make disappear it's functionally anonymous and horrible for everyone else.

@ElliottPlack thanks for bringing this to my attention, I'll see what happened.