Hello.
Please split your edits into smaller geographic regions so that's easier to review them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132800976

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you mapping here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798660

Hello.
Do you know if the playground south of the school associated with that school?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132798285

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you convert this from building:part into just plain area? And what exactly do you mean by Stuytown Gyms? What kind of feature is this?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132771884

It doesn't matter if it's local area or not.🙂

But if a feature is tagged as it doesn't exist, all the other facts become irrelevant.. because it doesn't exist anymore.
I don't know how exactly you are processing OSM data but adding support for features that are tagged as closed seems like a very logical thing to do.

disused: lifecycle prefix is a standard way to tag closed places... disused:*=*

Hello.
This is already tagged as disused:amenity=atm, so
there's no need to add disused:currency:XBT to it. Data consumers already know that it doesn't exist.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132770099

I'm not sure if curb cutouts is an endorsement by DoT that people can cross there.
At the very least I think we definitely shouldn't tag unmarked crosswalks where there are 3 marked and 1 unmarked on an intersection.

Hello.
I see that in many places you've been adding crossing=unmarked. I'm not sure if this is correct to map them. Streets are intended to be crossed where there's a crosswalk. If you map unmarked crosswalks then logically speaking 100% of the area between 2 parallel sidewalks should be marked as unmarked crosswalk since you can cross the street at any point.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132750938

That doesn't seem to be grammatically correct for the Russian language rules. These are 2 and 3 separate words, not joined words. 🤔

optimally, group them per neighborhood, but at most group them by state.

Please split your changes into smaller geographic areas.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132713125

Once again, PLEASE split up your changesets into smaller bboxes. There's no need for such a huge bbox for only 3 POIs
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132705360

Hello.
Shouldn't this be "Стадион Метлайф"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132693968

Hello.
Shouldn't it be "Вулворт Билдинг"?
And in general, shouldn't each word be capitalized since they are names?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132692599

Hello.
When mapping features please pay attention not to glue features to each other unless they are actually connected. In this edit you glued dog park to the sidewalk..
Additionally, opening_hours tag has a pretty specific syntax. You can read more about it at opening_hours=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132684017

There's no need to have such a giant bbox to update just 5 things. Please split up your changeset into smaller geographical areas.

I'll repeat once again, location description does not belong in the POI name. We have branch= tag for that! This is the last time I'm fixing this. Next time you do it, I'll flag your account to DWG!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132656363

I see what you are referring to.👍
Perhaps it's better to retag these buildings using building:part= style as documented in building:part=* ?

Hello.
Please note that you made a mistake here. When dealing with buildings that are constructed as relations, all tags must be on relations themselves. Elements that define outer and inner parts of building should be tagless lines. You can read more about it here osm.wiki/Relation:building
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/132642705