OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
127149322 over 3 years ago

Hello.
I believe you made a mistake here. The left and right most lanes are just parked cars, not moving lanes. So it's 2+3 layout.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127149322

127144778 over 3 years ago

Hello.
"Island", "Statue" and "Park" are part of those features' names, not just descriptors, so shouldn't they be capitalized too?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127144778

127107282 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change this tower into full building rather than building part?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127107282

126970281 over 3 years ago

But when converting it from node to way, did you not see on way/1100755168
addr:housename="6.30am to 4.45pm, Monday to Friday and 6.30am to 4.45pm on the weekends"? ๐Ÿคจ
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126970281

126920723 over 3 years ago

Seriously, NYMM, you people STILL don't know how to properly add OSM tags?!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126920723

126868248 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Please note that bus stop name should be its full street names, without abbreviations. "ref=" tag here is intended for the MTA's unique bus stop number. Bus route number goes into "route_ref=" tag.

Additionally, rather than deleting restaurant info in one node and adding it to another, it's better to just move the node to its new place and update the address and whatever other info is relevant. That way you are preserving history of that object if it ever needs to be referred to again.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126868248

126845894 over 3 years ago

Hello.
There are a couple of issues with this edit.

It seems like for no reason you attached an address node to a sidewalk near 1st st and 7th ave. This is not a correct way to map such features since address is obviously not part of a sidewalk.

You named a community garden as "Plantville". Where is that name coming from?

You mapped 2nd ave bike lane as a separate way. However, it is already as tagged on 2nd ave way itself. Your change goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
Additionally, the name you gave to that bike lane goes against osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions guideline.

Similarly, Washington Park's baseball field is already tagged in the sport pitch area.

126839779 over 3 years ago

Also, it's cool that a city transportation planner is mapping for OSM๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ™‚

126839779 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Unfortunately, there are many issues with your edit.
For one, many of the bike paths that you added are already mapped as tags on their relevant road ways. The way you mapped goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
Additionally, in your edit it seems like most of the ways you added are named like "Montgomery Street Protected Bike Lane", however as documented in osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions "name=" tag should be used as a description.
Also, most of the ways you added contain many needless nodes on seemingly straight lines. While that's not outright wrong, it creates unnecessary extra work when ways need to be adjusted to more accurate satellite imagery or road reconfiguration, plus extra data in the OSM database.
Please correct these issues, otherwise this edit will be fully reverted.

Also, please make your edits smaller. That makes it easier to review them, and if there are any problems, only smaller amount of data would have to be reverted of fixed.

126837851 over 3 years ago

Hello.
You tagged Sterling Place as having bike lane on the right side and not left. However, satellite and streetview imagery shows the opposite. Could you please elaborate on your edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126837851

126835810 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Please note that it's inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business if that business occupies only part of that building.
A 3-story apartment building should not be tagged as a liquor store which is only on the first floor.
A 3-story office building must not be tagged as a cafe.
For these situations each business must be mapped as a separate node within the perimeter of the building they occupy.
A building can be tagged as a business only if that business occupies the whole building. For a example a stand-alone fast-food restaurant or something like Costco.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126835810

126832502 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Please update your StreetComplete version. Your version is very old compared to the current one.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126832502

126822467 over 3 years ago

Hello.
This crosswalk doesn't seem correct.. Did you intend to map it like that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126822467

126807065 over 3 years ago

You can easily look at the history of each of that kerb, in this changeset I have no deleted any tags you added to these kerbs. 7 of them were just empty tagless nodes and I created the 8th one.
10062691622
10062641071
10062717022
10062717023
10062717024
10062719487
10062719486
10063051280
You can use https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/ to see the history of each node.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126807065

126807065 over 3 years ago

Which "that crossing" are you referring to? This changeset covers the whole w96..
Unless I made some mistake, I did not change any existing curb tags. I simply made nodes that connect sidewalks to crosswalks as curbs. In places where I could see from satellite imagery those plastic rumble plates, I tagged it as lowered, tactile and wheelchair. In places where I couldn't tell, I simply left it as kerb with no explicit indication of wheelchair accessibility either way to allow for local survey to update it to the correct values. I don't assume all intersections to be wheelchair accessible since not all are.

126773307 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Please note that as documented in traffic_calming=island traffic_calming=island is intended only for traffic calming feature, not pedestrian refuge area.
What you are looking for is crossing:island=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126773307

126678562 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Please note that "crossing=marked" is intended specifically for crosswalks with STOP sign.
Crosswalks that are controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as "crossing=traffic_signals". ๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678562

126678105 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Is this footpath not lead to this building's entrance?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126678105

126673328 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? There's a bike path on the right but not on the left?๐Ÿคจ That seems contrary to the satellite imagery..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126673328

126658141 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Just fyi in case you were not aware of, recently there's been a proposal approved on how to consistently tag crosswalk markings: crossing:markings=*. This should cover all the different stripes and lines we encounter in nyc๐Ÿ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126658141