Please split up your edits into smaller geographic regions to make it easier for people to review them.👍

Yup, looks good to me. 👍

Hello.
What kind of syntax error did you correct over 3 continents wide?

If you remember where the gate was, it would be great to add it as well. 👍

Hello.
Is there a gate somewhere blocking access to that street?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122846938

Hello.
What is the purpose of creating this kind of link of both sidewalks are already mapped as separate paths?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122823742

Hello.
Once again I kindly ask you to provide changeset comments to better understand what you are editing.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122811727

Hello.
Please note that you absolutely CANNOT use data from Google Maps to map in OSM! It is a copyright violation!
Please see osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
This edit is going to be reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122804020

Hello.
What is the meaning of "year=1991" tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122803363

Hello.
What business are you mapping for?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122801183

Hello.
You tagged one of the buildings here as a storage tank. Is that accurate? From the satellite imagery it appears to be a regular building..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776193

Hello.
When mapping features, please try not attach/glue/snap unrelated features to each other unless they are actually attached. That makes it harder in the future to edit them. In this case there's no need for these 2 bike racks to be attached to the neighborhood area polygon. 🙂
It might be a little bit more hassle when editing, but something to look out for. 👍
I fixed it up for you.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776038

Hello.
You added a footway here with "layer=-1" implying that it is underground. Is that correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122764046

There are no tags for wikimedia, but you are welcome to link to the correct wikidata Q reference number as documented in wikidata=*

When linking to wikipedia articles it should be just "wikipedia=language:page title", not the whole https:// url. I fixed it up for you. 👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122762526

Hello.
What do you mean by these ref tags?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122758472

1) I have no control how this app tags things as closed.
2) I have already updated this node with relevant information.
3) Go ahead and report me and revert this. I love me some edits wars.

There's no need to delete it since it's there. However, it shouldn't have a name which doesn't exist.

You might be misunderstanding that tag. It is intended to be used with building=construction, highway=construction, landuse=construction or railway=construction to give more specific information about that object.
Based on what I see it's not intended for POIs.

Since this is not its actual name and osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions this doesn't seem like a proper way to tag this feature. At most it could be considered "loc_name", but even then it's just a name that you came up with and not something referred as by others. And that's still a description of the feature and not as much of a name. But just became a feature doesn't have name doesn't mean it can't be mapped, so it's fine for it to be nameless.
You could also consider tagging it as "attraction=maze" + "maze=labyrinth", but these are not officially agreed tags.

I don't read German so I can't tell, but is that an accepted and documented tag or just some terminology they are playing around with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122689589