Since you are unable to provide verifiable information of this change for others to confirm it, this changeset will be fully reverted. Your continual attempts to edit this feature without verifiable proof will be considered vandalism and flagged to DWG.

osm.wiki/Verifiability
Considering you lied in your previous changeset comments, "I talked to my guy" is not a verifiable aspect that other mappers can confirm.

wow. you actually went through them all and split them up.😱😵👏
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121263363

Please provide a way to verify this information otherwise this edit will be reverted in whole as unverifiable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121242583

Please provide a way to verify this information otherwise it'll be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121242139

Hello.
OSM's data is used by hundreds if not thousands of different data consumers. It is wrong to delete a POI purely because it doesn't show up in your game. This POI was properly tagged according to OSM rules. If it doesn't show up in your game you should contact your game's support and figure out why doesn't work. If you continue to vandalize the game you'll be reported to OSM's DWG.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121238312

Hello.
Generally if you are mapping kerbs, crosswalks go only between them and don't extend onto sidewalks. I know it'll create more hassle to split and tag those extra segments, but it'd be nice to do that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121207974

Please stop lying in your changeset comments. You didn't get any local resident information. You are getting paid upx to add this.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121197487

Hello.
Why did you remove building=mosque tag from this building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121182887

This feature is already mapped and as such goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element principle. This edit is going to be reverted.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121181972

NYMM, Why are you STILL entering wrong opening hours?! After all this time you still haven't figured it out?!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121164992

You can see it here https://osmcha.org/changesets/121158360/ I think this is the correct syntax. It gets kinda confusing😅

Don't worry about it, I'll remove them and add relevant tags. I'll let you know once its done so you can see it.

Hello.
This is incorrect way to map these streets since they already mapped. What you've done goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
A better way to map this would be to add appropriate tags on the existing road segments.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121152395

Hello.
building:flats= tag is intended for indicating number of apartments in a building. Is that what you meant to tag or did you mean 3 floors?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121107495

If you want to add mapillary imagery, sure. Hopefully it'll be useful to them and they'll process it to extract useful data.

So is the construction on all those houses complete and the road is open to public traffic?

How were you able to get that data? What was the source of it?

Please note that you can't use Google Maps to get information for OSM. Please see this article osm.wiki/Google

Hello.
As documented in crossing=* intersections that are controlled by traffic lights are supposed to be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals.
crossing=marked is intended for STOP sign intersections.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121072459

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Satellite imagery doesn't seem to show that there's a residential road here.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121066624