OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
121043431 over 3 years ago

None of the garbage that you spewed goes into the description tag. In you stretch to the maximum it might be valid for the note tag, but most definitely not description! Plus your blatant attempt to tag OSM with your "BUC" tags will not be allowed! Keep your nft/beanie babies scam out of OSM!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121043431

121019687 over 3 years ago

This revert/edit doesn't make sense.
You tagged the whole way that goes ALONG a road as "crossing:unmarked". That incorrect. Also just because people are crazy enough to walk along a road doesn't mean that's part of the official road network. Furthermore, the way you connected it at Continental Ave intersection also doesn't make sense from the routing point of view.
And regarding the existing path, informal=yes is the correct way to tag desire paths.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121019687

121030354 over 3 years ago

Which OASIS NYC map are you referring to? CUNY one? If so, it shows this street name. Also both streets.planning.nyc.gov and ZoLa show it. However Bing or Streetview don't show any street signs there, but both imagery seem to be pretty old(2014-ish). Cyclomedia is giving me error for now. 🤔
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121030354

121019366 over 3 years ago

Is this place open again? I'm seeing news articles and other sources that it was shut down
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121019366

120369284 over 3 years ago

Oh, but addr:state tag must be 2 capital letters. 👍

120369284 over 3 years ago

What you did is not wrong, just seems like extra effort for something that won't be used. 🙂 If that restaurant was already mapped, ya, it makes sense to use lifecycle prefix. But for a brand new POI it seems like overkill. Again, not wrong. 🙂

120994526 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? What do you mean by tentative location?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120994526

120986208 over 3 years ago

This edit is going to be completely reverted since every single change here is wrong:
* You are not supposed to be tagging the whole building if a biz doesn't occupy the whole building.
* The location of that business is wrong.
* The address of that biz is wrong.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120986208

120985858 over 3 years ago

As documented in addr:state=* this tag is supposed to be 2 letter UPPER CASE abbreviation of state name.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120985858

120948910 over 3 years ago

Hmm. It seems like you are correct. I must have missed that detail. 🤔

120948910 over 3 years ago

On Mapbox imagery you can see grey squares at both sides of some of those crosswalk.
They look like this https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactile_paving#/media/File%3ATruncated_domes.jpg
They are often red or yellow, but sometimes grey like here.

120956064 over 3 years ago

Hello.
You tagged a bunch of blocks as natural=scrub. I wonder if landuse=greenfield or brownfield would be more suitable for these areas? These plots are owned by the city and marked as commercial and residential(you can see it on Zola).
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120956064

120948910 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Satellite imagery shows that there are tactile/rumble tiles on some of these intersections..?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120948910

120934443 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Why are you intentionally breaking address tags for this business? House number and street name go into separate tags.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120934443

120916178 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Why did you delete valid tags from this flag pole?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120916178

120914731 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete name of this school and deleted a perfectly valid self-storage node only to recreate another one with less information?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120914731

120901844 over 3 years ago

Hmm. You are right about the 3 letter code. I haven't noticed that. 👍

120901844 over 3 years ago

Hello.
This change doesn't seem to make sense. This is a currency exchange office, not a mint or a mine. They don't manufacture those things.
currency=* vs product=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120901844

120901447 over 3 years ago

Hello.
What does it mean "landuse"? That doesn't really say what you changed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120901447

120900807 over 3 years ago

Looking on wiki and taginfo, it seems like the value is "legislative"? "legislator" has never been used before.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120900807