Hello.
Please note that crosswalks controlled by traffic light should be tagged as such. "marked" crosswalks are intended for the ones with STOP signs. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119917864

Hello.
There are a number of issues with this changeset that would be great for you to address in the future.
It's not necessary to create so many nodes on a perfectly straight sidewalk. This only bloats map data with no useful features. It also makes sidwalk lines don't look straight.

Crosswalks controlled by pedestrian lights should be tagged with "crossing=traffic_signals".
Crosswalks controlled by stop sign should be tagged with "crossing=marked".
When mapping sidewalks as separate paths, it's also important to tag "sidewalk=separate" on the relevant street way so that system knows that sidewalks are already mapped and not just missing, or doesn't think that sidewalks were mapped twice.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119912588

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete building number from its tag and instead incorrectly moshed it into street name?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119909538

Customers and people who left reviews where? OSM doesn't have reviews...🤨

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change an obviously residential road as a foot path?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119863545

Hello.
Do you mean by "local resident information"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119856217

Hello.
Does this restaurant occupy the whole building or just the ground floor and above it is a residential/office building?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119818729

What does "TAD STCLM" mean?

Does this new restaurant has the same website address as the old one?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119801173

Hello.
As documented in osm.wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions please note that it is inappropriate to use description of a feature as its name. As such this name is going to be removed. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119801113

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete wikidata tag here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119789476

Hello.
Aren't gazebos hexagonal?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119788540

Hello.
Do you have more information about this "artwork"? Just having a single tag with nothing else is rather not helpful.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119782754

Hello.
opening_hours tag has a specific format for its values, such as hours must be in 24-hour format. You can read more details about it on opening_hours=*
Additionally, you can use this website to help you generate valid opening_hours tags https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119773018

That fact it "clutters the map" should be irrelevant to you. OSM is used by thousands of different data consumers. Some maps are designed specifically to display streets and to judge how green areas are. Other maps filter out trees. Others give priority to labels over map features. And there are thousands of other situations and combinations.
It is wrong to delete data from the map simply because you do not like how it looks in one specific map style. It's called "tagging for renderer" and it is wrong. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Don't worry if the map looks messy or cluttered. The most important thing is for the data to be as accurate as possible. Let systems that generate maps worry about making it readable.

This is not just for me, but for every other mapper in NYC and globally that look over the map to make sure that the data is accurate and correct. 🙂 And also for yourself, if at some point in the future you'll be looking over your own changesets, it'll be easier to find the one you need and to understand and remember what exactly you were doing in it.

TEST=TEST?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119407827

Hello.
This is invalid way to tag multiple addresses for a building. This should be done simply with address node.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119740673

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete this tree node when it's clearly visible in satellite imagery?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730256

Hello.
Considering you are mapping in US, and most editors here speak English, please write your changeset comments in English. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119728336