MxxCon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 119447689 | almost 4 years ago | Why did you remove bike lane tagging here?
|
| 119446907 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
|
| 119444409 | almost 4 years ago | Residential construction in the middle of the road?
|
| 119422496 | almost 4 years ago | How come you removed tourism=hotel tags from this building?
|
| 119398334 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
|
| 119364745 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
|
| 119364637 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
|
| 119275706 | almost 4 years ago | StreetComplete app has a feature that allows you to use your phone's camera with AR to measure distances. Really convenient to use and pretty accurate.๐ |
| 119281058 | almost 4 years ago | viewpoint, not waypoint |
| 119275706 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
|
| 119243561 | almost 4 years ago | Nebraska covers all of continental US?๐คจ |
| 119234979 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
|
| 119217384 | almost 4 years ago | Hello.
Generally it's best edit and update existing features rather than delete and recreate. That way you preserve history of that object and ability to properly revert if necessary.
|
| 115446690 | almost 4 years ago | It needs to be updated in the NSI template too otherwise the next person fixing such warning will clubber your changes. |
| 115446690 | almost 4 years ago | I believe it's coming from https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/transit/route/bus.json#L1370 |
| 115446690 | almost 4 years ago | iD prompted to update these tags based on its template.. or at least it did at the time when I was editing it. |
| 119137062 | almost 4 years ago | Thank you for fixing the shape. :) ๐
|
| 119127771 | almost 4 years ago | It looks like there are 3 buildings?
|
| 119089979 | almost 4 years ago | For one, if I were to search for such an address, getting a building as a result is more useful than a whole area including playgrounds and sport fields and parking lots and whatever else might be included. I don't have first hand experience with this, but I'd imagine that for data consumers it's easier to have one schema of encoding address of schools rather than implementing every possible variation one could come across. Also I could be misremembering, but I think there are some validators that complain about "address inside of address" check, ie area has an address and there's a node or building with same/different address inside of that area. |
| 119089979 | almost 4 years ago | There's amenity=school#How_to_map It doesn't explicitly mention the addr: tag, however if you think about this logically, school grounds can encompass multiple buildings with separate addresses. Putting address into school ground area would prevent you from accurately representing addresses.
|