"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175125573

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
There are at least 2 camera nodes on top of each other.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126569

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126578

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
There are at least 2 camera nodes on top of each other.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126640

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126652

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
There are at least 3 camera nodes overlapping each other.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126788

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126799

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126801

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
There are at least 2 camera nodes overlapping each other.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126980

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175126986

"overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
There are 3 camera nodes overlapping each other.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127066

"overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127068

"overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127086

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127594

"Overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175127605

"overhead" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175128030

"City pole" is not a valid value for camera:mount= tag.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/175128365

Hello.
In general in OSM it's better to try to edit an existing feature to its current state rather than delete a feature and create a new one.
Editing an existing feature preserves history of that object, if there's ever a need to refer to it in the future. Doing delete/create loses that history.
In this specific case it's not so critical since that object didn't have any other edits, but in the future please try to avoid delete/create.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/173107234

Good job👍🙂I added a couple more tags to cams, gantry and pole and adjusted the position of the street itself to be closer to the middle of the actal roadbed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/174842508

My apologies about duplicate messages. It looked like they originally didn't send.

You could separately map that pole and gantry and then attach cameras to that gantry. But if that's too much for now, that's alright too. 😅