OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
145456697 about 2 years ago

Swimming pools should be mapped to the feature that actually contain water, not pavement perimeter around it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145456697

145441366 about 2 years ago

Hello.
What is the purpose of this note= tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145441366

145441167 about 2 years ago

A newspaper article is NOT a proper website= of a feature. You mean mention it as a changeset source tag, but it's most definitely not this club's website.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145441167

145342951 about 2 years ago

This edit has the same problem as the previous one. This bike path is already mapped as tags on the roads.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145342951

145339377 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Please note that this changeset will be reverted in full since it goes against osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element. All the features you added are already mapped as tags on Plaza Street West way.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145339377

145313730 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Rather than writing that as text description, why not add entrance nodes at appropriate locations?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145313730

145312291 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Could you elaborate why did you delete building tag here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145312291

145307458 about 2 years ago

Hello.
You keep deleting and recreating features with identical tags. Why are you doing this? What kind of analysis involves deleting valid OSM features?
When you needlessly OSM features, you also delete their history, which can be useful in the future to refer to such an element.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145307458

145301277 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Please note that other can proper names, all tag values must be in the lower name, so instead of "Black" it should be "black".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145301277

145411110 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are you trying to map here?
What is the meaning of "place:area_alternate=park" tag? This is not a normal tag used in OSM.

Based on the available satellite imagery, these appear to be tennis courts. Could you explain why did you not map them as such? Is the satellite imagery not accurate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145411110

145392951 about 2 years ago

These buildings have "addr:street=S Midland Ave".
That's incorrect.
The correct street name is "South Midland Avenue", fully spelled out.

145392951 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Please do not abbreviate street names. They should be fully spelled out. You can read more about this guideline at osm.wiki/Abbreviations

145130227 about 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure both iD and RapiD update that field wherever you switch imagery to include the ones you looked at. 🤔 Strange that it didn't update for you. 👍

145220165 about 2 years ago

Hello.
There's a confusion in names.
name=Ride Aid
name:en=Walgreens
Which one is it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145220165

145219892 about 2 years ago

Hello.
As documented in description=* this tag MUST NOT be used for advertising or promotional purposes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145219892

145190912 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Instead of completely deleting such a POI and destroying the history of this object and making this address unsearchable, it's much better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or at the very least delete only biz-specific tags, but leave address info alone.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145190912

145130904 about 2 years ago

Hello.
Why would you split this sidewalk way and delete the sidewalk tag from it? This is still a sidewalk up the curb..
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145130904

145096881 about 2 years ago

Telling others to "visit and see for yourself" is not an acceptable proof for supporting information osm.wiki/Verifiability.
"Everyone knows" is also not an acceptable claim. *I* don't know it and am I not part of "everyone"?
Anybody who doesn't live in that area wouldn't know that there's a construction going on.

Lyft maps based on reports from their drivers and if requested they can provide photos/footage of the features they map.

Providing a link to something like https://x.com/_elkue/status/1732038849910731246 would've been perfectly sufficient.

145130590 about 2 years ago

The description tag should be used for neutral tone description of an object. description=*
I'm not sure if 1st-person account of what you were told by somebody else is a suitable form for that tag.😉
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145130590

145130227 about 2 years ago

Hello.
I see you made this edit based purely on Bing imagery. Unfortunately, by now it's getting rather old and sometimes doesn't match what's on the ground. Please confirm with other, newer imagery, such as ESRI to make sure that you don't miss newly constructed crosswalks or other feature changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145130227