I guess in their opinion sacrifice of a bar vs theirs-perceived benefit to other biz worth it.

opposes safe streets as in they want dangerous streets?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137428977

Hello.
You once again make giant changesets with A LOT of incorrect tagging.
Once again, description= tag is NOT intended for you documenting or how or when you mapped something. It is intended as a description of a given feature.
Additionally, in virtually every single features you mapped you added a business as a wikidata proper of a feature. That is most definitely incorrect. It should be mapped as operator:wikidata.
It's been at least 10 days since your edit and you haven't fixed these errors.
Please correct them or your edits will be reverted in whole and your account forwarded to DWG, which might result in account block or even ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137389586

Hello.
Shouldn't this be cuisine=mexican, and therefore tacos=yes as an additional tag to more explicitly indicate what kind of Mexican food?
Even if not, according to cuisine=* values should be singular, not plural, so "taco".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137330473

Hello.
Your edit intentionally made the previously properly mapped data incorrect. If you continue to vandalize data like that, your account will be referred to DWG which can result in suspension or even outright ban.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137308968

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137307069

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306741

Hello.
If you are mapping sidewalks, they are supposed to be tagged as such, and not just footway.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137306436

@Tatti Barletta, if you see wrong data, it should either be reverted or corrected.

If this is not a real name, we shouldn't really invent them. It's fine for a feature to be without a name.
It's perfectly fine to add description explaining what it is though.

What is that phone number? It doesn't seem to belong to delta

Hello.
Proposed features really shouldn't go into OSM. OSM is a map about what's in the world NOW, not how it's going to be at some point in indeterminate future.
What's the use of having non-existing features on the map? Once the project starts and they start digging, I can see the map getting updated as it progresses. But having the whole thing there while it's going to take 5, 10, 20 years to complete is unnecessary map clutter.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137242930

This edit has similar mistakes as the previous one. american_handball != handball.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137226251

Hello.
Most of these features appear to be incorrectly tagged.
Handball is not the same sport as American Handball
sport=american_handball
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_handball
Also of those features do not appear to be american handball courts atll, but tennis courts, hockey field.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137226134

Hello.
Similar question to the previous edit, does this cable and wind farm actually exist already or it's going to be constructed at some point in the future?
And once again, this cable is connected to many features, such as the boundary of US, which doesn't seem correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137171891

Hello.
The feature that you mapped, does it already exist or just planned?
Also why is this cable attached to a ferry route?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137168044

Hello.
Is this actually the official name of this area or just a name you came up with to identify it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137157510

Hello.
Rather than deleting a feature and creating a new one, it's generally better to edit existing feature to be up to date. Doing that preserves history of that object which can be useful to refer to in the future.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137155613

Hello.
Are you sure that this subway station has no benches?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137153933

Hello.
You could use iD editor's builtin Bing street imagery to try to figure out the missing info, if it's recent enough. Alternatively, nothing beats in-person surveying. 😊
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/137152954