I don't think it's correct to tag it as recreation_ground or outdoor_seating.
landuse=recreation_ground
This is just a regular pedestrian street with some shops and benches.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136791469

Hello.
Please note that amenity=disused:restaurant is an invalid value.
What you are looking for is a lifecycle tag prefix osm.wiki/Tag:disused:amenity=.
You can read more about it at osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136786687

I don't understand what you are saying.
Yes, there are other street relations. Yes, they should be looked over and perhaps considered if they are necessary.
I saw you make this edit and commented on it.
There are only so many hours in the day to edit maps. One step at a time. Handle this relation and at a later point handle other.

Unless I'm misreading the satellite imagery, it's still "flat", isn't it? While the glass structure is round, the roof itself is flat, no?

It is when it is necessary.
But when it adds no value to the map, it is unnecessary extra work and hassle.

It seems like this relation adds nothing to the map that is not already represented by the existing ways and tags.
You say "used to bind scattered elements", but Wall Street is not scattered and all 4 ways are contiguous and connected to each other.
I'm not "bothered", but my concern with adding relation is that they complicate editing the map requiring extra steps to make sure relation remains intact and add/remove ways in that relation as needed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/135689512

I don't think it's incorrect to have both area and ways. Crossing highways warning is probably just a matter of connecting them at the intersection points.
But as the warning states, I don't think there are any routers which support navigation through areas, so without ways these areas are unroutable..

Hello.
Perhaps it's better to leave these ways in place and instead tag them as "access=no" or "access=emergency"?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136767708

Hello.
Why did you delete name= tag here? It is intended for the default, local language, which in US is English.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136758785

Hello.
When you merged some of these POIs they got 2 different zipcodes. That can't correct since zip codes are not overlapping.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136721020

Isn't previous name correct? It is named St. Mark's Place, after the nearby St. Mark's Church in-the-Bowery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Mark%27s_Church_in-the-Bowery
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136717976

Hello.
Is this value accurate? Satellite imagery doesn't show this to be a dome roof.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136712378

Please note that review_requested= is not a valid tag. It should not be used.
You should use fixme=* tag and indicate what exactly needs to be addressed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136707355

Hello.
Why do you have ' around opening_hours= value?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136704201

Hello.
Why did you delete all these way here? Seems like they were correctly mapped.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136676204

Hello.
Are you sure there are no benches here? Last time I was here about a year ago there were a few benches on the platform
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136661010

Ocean Pkw is weird here. Service road has the stop sign, but Ave Z on the same intersection has traffic lights
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136638560

Hello again.
This changeset should also be reverted since the bike path is already mapped as tags on Clinton Street way itself.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136623373

Hello.
This edit has the same problem as the previous edit. Bike infrastructure features have already been tagged and this edit should be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136622669

Hello.
Please note that this bike path is already mapped as tags on the Delacey Street itself. As such, it is inappropriate to map it again as separate way since that goes again osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
This change should be reverted.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/136622149