OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
120720624 over 3 years ago

Hello.
gnis:feature_id tag is supposed to be numeric, not name. Also searching GNIS for that name produces no results...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120720624

120684280 over 3 years ago

Yelp, Yahoo and MapQuest are all copyrighted and proprietary sources which are not allowed to be used in OSM. This edit is going to be reverted.
Please read osm.wiki/Copyright
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120684280

120682392 over 3 years ago

What kind of "stuff" did you edit here?
Your edit covers 3 continents over the Atlantic Ocean...

Please take a look at this article osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

120679377 over 3 years ago

Hello.
As documented in phone=*#Phonewords it is inappropriate to map phone number with words. It should've been expanded into the actual correct numbers. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120679377

120671471 over 3 years ago

How exactly are you doing a better job by outright deleting valid address nodes and creating new ones with wrong information?
How exactly are you doing a better job by leaving snarky, pissy and useless changeset comments that don't help anybody understand what you are mapping. Please read this article to better understand what makes for good comments: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120671471

120670907 over 3 years ago

This is clearly a 3-story residential building. As such it is wrong to tag it as having 1 level.
Being a residential building and this bar occupying only the first floor, it is wrong to tag the whole building as a bar. You have been advised not to to do it in the past, yet you still do it.
So how exactly are you doing a better job by making outright wrong edits?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120670907

120670195 over 3 years ago

Why did you delete a valid address node?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120670195

120654772 over 3 years ago

Hello.
This church is already mapped as tags on its building, therefore it's not needed to be mapped as a separate node. You can read about this guideline at osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120654772

120648348 over 3 years ago

Also regarding the razed train tracks, consider checking out this article, it talks about it in more details osm.wiki/Demolished_Railway

120648348 over 3 years ago

Not glueing to roads(unless necessary) is a good practice 🙂 but beyond that it's better to map features to what they are in the real world. If there's a school or a park or a construction site or some other clearly defined feature, map them to their actual perimeter which often is demarked with a fence or grass adjacent to sidewalks.🙂👍
Yes, misaligned satellite imagery can be challenging to decide which one is the most accurate. Just do your best guess there. Sometimes turning on gps tracks or streetview layers might be useful to try to estimate which imagery is more aligned.
If you have any questions feel free to ask 👍

120648348 over 3 years ago

Additionally, you mapped razed LIRR Rockaway Beach Branch tracks. However, looking at the available satellite imagery, there are no traces of those tracks whatsoever. As such there's no point mapping them. OSM is about what's in the world now, not what once was there. If you want, you are welcome to map these tracks in OHM.👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120648348

120648348 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Once again, please try to map areas to their actual perimeter and not extending to the middle of road. Accurate perimeters are important for multiple reasons, including basic property ownership limits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120648348

120630382 over 3 years ago

Maybe the door was push, not pull?🤣

120630566 over 3 years ago

Hello again.
In OSM it is generally better to fix tags of an existing node rather than delete and create a new one. This way you would be preserving history of that node so that if necessary it could be referred to in the future.
In this specific case it's not as important since there's no history, but in other situations that might be more meaningful. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120630566

120630382 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Those opening hours seem to be correct according to the official website at https://locations.theupsstore.com/ny/brooklyn/535-flatbush-ave
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120630382

120480745 over 3 years ago

Also, having said that, one thing you should be aware of, is that for mappers one of the most important aspect is to make sure that the underlying data is as accurate as possible, and not that the map looks pretty. 🙂
If the data is good, let the different maps worry how to ensure that all the useful and relevant data is displayed at various zoom levels.

It's an incorrect approach to try to intentionally fudge things around just so that it shows up the way you like in one specific map style.
OSM's data is used by dozens if not hundreds of different maps designed for various purposes, and they rely on the accuracy of the data.
If you haven't see this article already, it explains this in a bit more detail: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
👍

120480745 over 3 years ago

I'm not sure what map you were looking at, perhaps it has some old cached data, but here on default OSM map style this building shows the name of what it is.

120604301 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Both of these features are already mapped, so your additions go against "One feature - one OSM element" concept as documented here: osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
Rather than adding these features as new nodes, you should add German names to the already mapped ones.👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120604301

120479513 over 3 years ago

There's no pettiness here.
I will not let OSM get vandalism by cryptobros like you and other scammers who have zero interest in actually helping OSM by PROPERLY mapping useful data, but instead the only interest is in scamming people out of their money.
FFS! Even your OSM profile is spam for your nft crap!
If you genuinely wanted to add useful data to OSM, you wouldn't intentionally DELETE valid information from the map. You wouldn't knowingly and intentionally add bad tags to the map. You wouldn't intentionally move and mis-position data on the map just so that your software can display labels because you don't know how to properly code it. You wouldn't intentionally add nonexisting features to the map. You wouldn't make crybaby changeset comments like "Don't be petty." or "more trees. need more trees... not enough trees. ". FFS! You don't even bother to add any wikidata or wikipedia tags to those "supposedly" historic places!

Why don't you and your cryptobros stop vandalizing the map and go buy some more of those beanie babies, that'll be a lot more useful.

120592516 over 3 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? You tagged a building as a cemetery?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120592516