OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
115371188 almost 4 years ago

It most definitely shouldn't be part of the "name" tag. I updated those nodes based on my understanding of entrance=*#Entrances_and_addresses
How to get to the rear 2 entrances? Imagery is not good enough to see which way on would have to go...If you are familiar with that area, adding paths would be beneficial. πŸ‘

115390115 almost 4 years ago

Hello.
Your edit of Alabama airports extended all the way to New York. Can you please elaborate what did you edit?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115390115

115371188 almost 4 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are those names you put for entrance?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115371188

115309934 almost 4 years ago

I presumed it's vandalism based on your edits, lack of reply to my comment and my cursory search on those warehouse names producing no relevant results. But it's good that you replied here. πŸ™‚πŸ‘

Rather than putting warehouse codes into "name" tag, they should probably go into "ref" tag as documented in ref=*
"name" tag would be something like "Carol B. TomΓ© Depot" or similar. Codes, serial numbers, IDs, etc are more appropriate for "ref" tag.

115309934 almost 4 years ago

Hello.
Please explain the source of the data you are entering. Otherwise, all your edits will reverted as vandalism!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115309934

115287983 almost 4 years ago

Hello.
Please try to keep your changesets limited to smaller geographic areas. That makes it easier to review your changes and it won't notify people in unrelated areas about such edits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115287983

115277773 almost 4 years ago

Hello.
Please try to keep your changes grouped to smaller geographic areas. That makes it easier review your edits and ensures that people in unrelated areas won't get notified about irrelevant changes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115277773

115233151 about 4 years ago

Is it active or decommissioned callbox? If decommissioned, perhaps it should be marked somehow so that it doesn't how up on emergency-related maps?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115233151

115228637 about 4 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate what are building names you entered in this edit, such as "EDINJ 0899"?
Also it seems like there are a few places where you mapped parked cargo trailers/containers as building. That doesn't seem correct and should be fixed.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115228637

115217043 about 4 years ago

Hello.
I see that in your edit you used only Mapbox satellite imagery. It is pretty good, however presently in NYC Bing imagery is newer and more representative of the state of roads.
Additionally, you edited Apple store's phone number format. Unfortunately, you modified it to have ( ) around area code. As documented in phone=*#Usage a phone number should be separated only by space or dash. πŸ‘
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115217043

115186969 about 4 years ago

As I mentioned, the way you mapped is not outright wrong. πŸ™‚
However, the difference is that tennis court sizes are fixed and standard, while fenced area around it can be whatever size there is available. Also mapping specifically to the marked area would allow you to map multi-court situations more accurately, for example like here way/564451752 πŸ‘

115190289 about 4 years ago

Hello.
Please note that it's inappropriate to "test" on a live, production server.
If you want to experiment with something, please see osm.wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115190289

115186969 about 4 years ago

Hello.
When mapping tennis courts, it's best to drawn to the actual marked tennis court itself, and less so to the surrounding fence. While the way you mapped it is not wrong, it's less accurate. πŸ‘
You can read more about this here: sport=tennis
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115186969

115184045 about 4 years ago

Hello.
From what I understand you are trying to do in this other similar edits, is to give names to sidewalks and crosswalks.
The way you are doing it is not a commonly accepted way of handing that. As documented in osm.wiki/Sidewalks there are osm.wiki/Relation:associatedStreet and osm.wiki/Proposed_features/Relation:street ways of doing it. And otherwise, such wide-scale changes should really be discussed and accepted by the local mapping community.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115184045

115164174 about 4 years ago

This whole chunk of roads could use some fixing what's a bridge, what's a tunnel, what's overlapping what..
It seems like your proprietary sources are more up to date than the publicly available satellite imagery. Perhaps you could take a stab at fixing those issues?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115164174

115111661 about 4 years ago

Ah, alright πŸ‘I thought maybe you dropped them without realizing there's easy way to make them straight line.

115111661 about 4 years ago

Hello.
Small suggestion regarding this edit. :) If you select multiple nodes and press S, it'll aligned them all to a line. It could be done with all these benches so that they look nice and straight rather than dropped by a drunk bomberπŸ˜‰
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115111661

114997632 about 4 years ago

Hello.
This is clearly a playground and not a schoolyard!
Description for this maproulette challenge state "Schoolyards are often incorrectly tagged as paved playgrounds, even though there’s no playground equipment." Satellite imagery here clearly shows there's playground equipment on site and there's no school attached to it.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114997632

114989703 about 4 years ago

Hello.
Could you please confirm if this whole giant area has a single address of 78 John Miller Way?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114989703

114929944 about 4 years ago

It's about local community preference. It's about accuracy of facts.