OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
99620108 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
iD editor has a specific preset categories for nursing homes and elderly group homes. It would be great if you updated this location with such preset if appropriate.(and "description" field won't be necessary) 👍

99533990 almost 5 years ago

You have an empty node here without any attributes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99533990

99533128 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
One of those webcams is not live, but a youtube video. It probably shouldn't be here...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99533128

99473503 almost 5 years ago

Yes, you can't copy data from another copyrighted source like google maps. however, they can't own facts, ie that this place exist...
Just doing regular online search for "gated community in mill basin" shows that it's Bay Front Estates.

99473503 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
Does that private community have an official name?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99473503

99386474 almost 5 years ago

Why did you delete legitimate buildings?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99386474

94165105 almost 5 years ago

Brian, looking at this user's other edits, they are either inexperienced or malicious edits. If you can, please check of the changes still need to be fixed.

99339279 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete seemingly legitimate map features?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99339279

99257091 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
There's a mistake in your edit. You tagged the whole building as being the craftsman. That is incorrect since it occupies only the ground floor and there's a large apartment building above it. The correct way to map such thing is to create a separate POI node and add business-specific info to it. As such I corrected your edit and added some more details.👍

99229737 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
This change is not a correct way to indicate that a business is permanently closed. Please use "disused" naming prefix as described in disused=*:
Alternatively, you can edit this node to remove all business-specific info by right-clicking on it and selecting "downgrade".
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. 👍

99203062 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you make these changes?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99203062

99201272 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
Never knew this area was an officially designated park with a separate name.🙂
One issue with your edit is that a correct key name for web addresses is `website`, not `url`.
Also, you deleted a clearly visible and identifiable sports field. It should probably still be mapped..👍

99138996 almost 5 years ago

I have no idea, but I can imagine if something is using this data, routes might not match up if their names are different from MTA's.
To figure out bus routes you are using MTA's data anyway...I don't see that being any different..

99138996 almost 5 years ago

According to https://bustime.mta.info/m/index?q=B36&l=&t= MTA calls this route
to CONEY ISLAND W 37 ST
to SHEEPSHEAD BAY AVENUE U
Perhaps it makes sense to name it the same way in relations?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99138996

99132461 almost 5 years ago

Hi.
Coney Island Creek is already mapped with way/101141590, isn't this a duplicate?

98936849 almost 5 years ago

I guess since underground "buliding" mapping is unclear, at least we should be mapping walkways to connect things. Probably especially the long ones further away from the actual stations?

98936849 almost 5 years ago

osm.wiki/Railway_stations documents some of the aspects of mapping subway stations.

99000830 almost 5 years ago

Hello. According to contact:instagram=* a more proper way of tagging Instagram information is by using "contact:instagram=<username>" key.👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99000830

98929109 almost 5 years ago

Maybe it's just the way osmcha displayed your changeset and I misinterpreted it. It looked like you created a road segment with a bunch of tags, including tiger ones and particularly "tiger: reviewed" one. So I was going to point out that it's not necessary to include that tag on newly created segments.

98936849 almost 5 years ago

Hello.
What did you base this edit on? Do you have some sort of map?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98936849