Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete both buildings here when all the available satellite imagery shows that this building is still here?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165827157

If you are not sure about the specific shape, it's probably better to map them as a node instead.

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you delete address from a building here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165809835

Hello.
what is this link?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165801865

Hello.
Are you sure about those parking spaces being free? I think I remember seeing central parking meters...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165798137

Hello.
Floor number is not the same as unit number.
Floor number has to be encoded in a separate tag as documented on addr:floor=*
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165787161

Hello.
In OSM, generally it's better to modify existing objects to their accurate state, rather than deleting them and create new ones.
In this changeset you deleted a building and instead drew 2 new ones. Doing this, you erased history of this previous object there and didn't transfer relevant tags to the new building.
Additionally, you added, apparently, recording studios, however you entered their floor numbers as their unit numbers. That is incorrect. OSM has a separate tag if an address has a floor number: addr:floor=*.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165804826

Hello.
In this changeset you deleted a perfectly valid address node. Why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165780824

Hello.
In this edit you dragged and glued an address node to a sidewalk. This is most definitely incorrect. Please pay close attention when you edit things and when you pan the map around not to accidentally modify features you didn't intend to. Also before submitting your changeset you are shown a preview of the changes you made, please try to look through those to make sure you didn't modify something unrelated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165780554

Hello.
This edit has a number of errors that must be corrected.
The value of the description= tag, while it might make sense now, a year, 2 or 3 later, "New dispensary" won't be an accurate description. As documented on description=* the description should be a neutral tone description of the given feature.
As documented on phone=* phone number must include country dialing code, and area code must not be separated using ( ), only - or space.
Additionally, website MUST include either http:// or https:// as appropriate.
Finally, you tagged this as a convenience store. But based on the description this sounds more like shop=cannabis as documented on shop=cannabis
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165779965

Hello.
Is this business already open or opening at some point in the future?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165779732

Hello.
Please note this edit has a couple of errors that must be fixed.
"New York City" is not a valid city name for Manhattan. It is just "New York".
Additionally, as documented at phone=* all phone numbers MUST have country dialing code. In US it's +1. Additionally, the digits should be separated either with - or space in the usual groupings.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165779606

Hello.
Most sidewalks in NYC are made of concrete, so please tag them as such rather than generic "paved".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165775015

Hello.
Are bikes explicitly not allowed here or are you just mapping that these paths are not suitable for biking?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165772775

The responsibility of translating shorthand like "W20" into a valid street name lies with geocoding services like OSM's Nominatim. Maintaining the accuracy of OSM data is paramount, and we should avoid polluting it with incorrect entries simply to satisfy the limitations of some software. Robust applications will adapt their search functionality to effectively process accurate OSM data and understand user intent.

Such big traffic circles on such narrow streets?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165677126

Hello.
Please note that "W20 Street" is not a valid alternative street name. As documented on osm.wiki/Abbreviations, street names should not be abbreviated.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165661334

Hello.
Could you please provide some supporting information regarding these features? None of the available satellite imagery show these shapes.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165653979

Hello.
Please note that "beige" is not a valid color name.
colour=*#Colour_names. It's much better to use proper hex color values.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165641614

Hello.
Instead of deleting existing POI and creating a new one, it's better to update the existing one. Doing that preserves history of that object if there's ever a need to refer to that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165618106