MxxCon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 156149636 | over 1 year ago | Yes, dogs get new furware there. 🫣 |
| 156152688 | over 1 year ago | Also according to https://untappedcities.com/2023/06/26/coney-island-hospital/ there will be a flood protection wall, driveway to the hospital entrance and green space. |
| 156152688 | over 1 year ago | According to a drawing on "what's happening here" sign it looks like it'll be a plaza/park in front of the rooth based ginsburg building. The demolition is going on right now. The buildings are down to 4 floors now. |
| 152832212 | over 1 year ago | They do it for situations where there are replacing curbs as part of the regular maintenance process and add lowered curbs so that if at some point in the future the city decides to modify a given intersection's rules they just need to slap some paint on to create a proper pedestrian crossing. |
| 153094708 | over 1 year ago | As documneted on tactile_paving=* "tactile_paving=yes" on a crossing way indicates a presence of tactile paving on the connecting KERBS, while the same tag on the crossing way indicates a presence of tactile surface on the way itself. Looking at the street-side imagery, I do not see any of the added crossings having any sort of tactile paving along the ways. Furthermore, a road's way is supposed to be mapped in the center of the physical road bed, not based on the paint or offset moving lanes. The way of E181 should be mapped straight, without that kink on the unmarked crossing.
|
| 152832212 | over 1 year ago | https://www.nyc.gov/html/dot/downloads/pdf/trafrule.pdf New York City Traffic Rules Section 4-04(c)(3), a pedestrian shall not: * Cross any road at an intersection except in a crosswalk.
|
| 152832212 | over 1 year ago | Actually that's exactly what directions should you to do! Crossing directions should not give you literally illegal instructions, ESPECIALLY for low vision and blind users! Routers should not be telling blind users to cross a road where drivers are not expecting to see pedestrians. |
| 152832212 | over 1 year ago | I removed it because in _my opinion_ unmarked crossing isn't indicating anything, because literally every single inch of a road between 2 sidewalks could be tagged as unmarked crossing. Plus it had tag "name=Crossing", which as documented on osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only shouldn't be used a made up descriptors of features.
|
| 152638859 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|
| 152626535 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|
| 152609458 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
Additionally, you created a closed way/1291940537, yet tagged it as a multipolygon.
Additionally, when mapping tennis courts, they should be mapped to the actual tennis court itself, not the surrounding area, which can be tagged separately. I corrected these issues for you.👍
|
| 152592808 | over 1 year ago | In this edit you also deleted highway=crossing tag. How come?
|
| 152592341 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|
| 152585996 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|
| 152565074 | over 1 year ago | Why did you delete crossing node on one of the ways here?
|
| 152564675 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
Also, please write meaningful changeset messages. Writing "." doesn't help others understand what you are editing.
|
| 152557106 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|
| 152554851 | over 1 year ago | Also please write descriptive changeset comments. Leaving that field blank doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing.
|
| 152554851 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|
| 152545465 | over 1 year ago | Hello.
|