Hello.
Is "Skyline Princess Gangway" the officially documented name of this feature or is this just a name that you came up with?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149717007

Hello.
Instead of outright deleting a node of a closed biz, it's much better to use lifecycle prefix tags as documented on disused:*=* or at the very least delete just biz-specific tags, but leave address info intact. Doing that not only preserves history of this osm, which can be useful to refer to in the future, but also allows this address to still be searchable and navigable.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149716952

As documented on highway=street_lamp "support=ground" means the light is sitting directly on the ground. That's logically contradictory to lamp_mount=straight_mast.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149677296

Impressive. You got this multipolygon relation right the first time. 😁
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149634111

If you are mapping individual parking spaces or groups of them, rather than the whole parking lot, you should use amenity=parking_space tag rather than just "parking". There's a preset for parking lots vs parking spaces.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149627494

If you want, you can indicate if this compressed air is free or not by adding fee=yes/no tag.👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149626795

While the way you mapped this is not outright wrong, I personally try to map features without fully overlapping each other because then it becomes a bit awkward when you want to select one, but the other one keeps getting selected.
In this specific case, rather than mapping this fence as a separate object, you could simply add barrier=fence tag to the parking lot itself since that's one of the features of this parking lot..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149625407

Hello.
You continue to map while ignoring comments to your previous problematic changesets.
All those issues MUST be corrected.

If you continue to ignore these comments your account will be flagged to Data Working Group, which can result in your temporary or even permanent ban and all your changes reverted in full.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149623442

Hello.
Noticed a small mix-up here. When you are mapping curbs, please pay attention to connect appropriate sidewalks to appropriate curbs. Walking from New Lots Ave and turning north to Junius St can be accomplished without crossing any curbs.
However, in this edit on the north east corner you connected 2 sidewalks to the same curb.
This can be problematic for people if they get routing directions with considerations for wheelchairs/strollers.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149618863

Oh ya, what I mentioned in the previous changeset especially applies here..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149618858

Hello.
If you like working with crosswalks, in addition to using the default editor iD, there's also RapiD(https://rapideditor.org/rapid). It works mostly exactly the same as iD, but in some situation significantly faster. One very useful feature is when you tag a crosswalk way, it automatically tags the intersecting node with appropriate tags as well.

It also has support for some external databases, like Microsoft's AI building detection (mostly irrelevant for NYC), some address databases around US and the world, etc.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149617697

Not to be too pedantic, and it probably doesn't matter as much for SI routes, but in other boros it seems like for the "operator" on other lines it's a bit more nuanced than just "MTA".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Transportation_Authority#Subsidiaries_and_affiliates, especially https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MTA_Regional_Bus_Operations
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149616848

Hello.
Could you please elaborate on that Virgin Mary Tree? What exactly is that?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149616397

The way you mapped this is not outright wrong, just not the optimal way.
The review checkbox is a helpful flag, but I tend to review all changesets regardless if it's marked or not. 😅

If sidewalks are mapped as separate ways like here, then other pedestrian features should be connected to sidewalks.
If sidewalks are mapped as tags on the roads themselves, then the pedestrian features should be connected to the road.
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. 👍

Shouldn't these huge stadium/sports flood lights be tagged as tower:type=lighting ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149593918

Did you get a chance to flag DWG to that account?
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149593119

Hello.
Please submit your changes grouped into smaller geographic regions. There's no reason for the same changeset to contain changes from Canada and Dubai.
In OSM multiple values are separated by ; not -. So if you want to list grades K-12, you have to explicitly list each one separated by ; Otherwise, it's recorded exactly as "K-12".
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592826

Hello.
Please remember that when you are mapping for this project 149, by default it hides all the buildings layer, so you do not see the complete OSM data. This building that you added already exists as way/247445606.
You can press "F" to open map data panel and there re-enable buildings layer to see everything.

I went ahead and deleted your duplicate. 👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149592822

Hello.
When mapping sidewalks, it's generally best not to map them as a single loop around the whole block, but rather as 4 sidewalk paths. Mapping it like that allows us to independently tag each sidewalk based on their parameters, such as surface, if it's lit or not, its width, etc.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/149591505