Hello.
Do you have any supporting evidence of the paths you added? None of the available satellite imagery shows the existence of them.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145096881

Sure, if you know that it should be sand, you can update it. 👍From satellite it looked rocky.

I don't remember if I mentioned it to you already or not, but https://jmapb.github.io/nycaabs/ is great for looking up building metadata in NYC. You can search it by address, building BIN number, block/plot, or right-click on that small map on the right. This site was built by jmapb, another NYC mapper.

alright. I updated it. building outline is probably not too accurate. hopefully once satellite imagery gets updated it can be fixed up. 👍

so that apartment building is not really part of the union theological seminary school? it's just on their property, but not part of the school?

am i correct to under that in the front there's some sort of church/religious building and behind it is an apartment building?

I'm trying to remember which validator complained about this🤔 That was the reason why I edited this and similar nearby features..
Maybe if not josm's then osmose or geofabrik's? I honestly don't remember.

Is the new building already complete or still under construction?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145092497

Why did you map all those features but then deleted them?🫤
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145090330

Hello.
Please group your edits into smaller geographic regions, such as a neighborhood, or a city at most.
There's no reason for this changeset to include changes in US and Canada.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145080715

Hello.
Please group your edits into smaller geographic regions, such as a neighborhood, or a city at most.
There's no reason for this changeset to include changes in US, Canada and Brazil.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145080416

Hello.
Please note that in OSM all tags are always in lower case. Upper case tags are invalid and ignored by all software.

Based on the text of your Note= tag, it sounds like it's more appropriate for the description= tag instead.

Looking at all the available satellite imagery, I'm not seeing anything that looks like a slipway as documented at leisure=slipway
It sounds like it should be canoe=put_in
Also, slipway=canoe doesn't seem to be a tag used by anybody else.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145077494

Hello.
What are you trying to map here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145058015

You can use https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016364 to look at this changeset. It actually shows the difference between previous and current tags/geometries.

Should that be leisure=slipway or canoe=put_in ?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145020329

Hello.
If I'm not mistaken JOSM validator complains about natural=coastline being fully enclosed by water...Or I don't remember the exact message, but it didn't like it...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145018283

Hello.
dark_store=* doesn't seem to be a standard OSM tag. Instead, I think what you are looking for is shop=outpost
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016670

Hello.
Instead of converting from amenity=bar into store=vacant, it's more correct to convert it into disused:amenity=bar.
And instead of shop=deli becomes store=vacant, it should be disused:shop=deli.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/145016364

Hello.
Generally, street-side parking should be mapped as tags on the road itself rather than a separate polygon.
You can read about the current parking tagging schema at osm.wiki/Street_parking
Towards the button of the page it includes links to some editing tools specifically designed for tagging parking features.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144953354

Hello.
In this changeset you damaged the multipolygon relation for Kiely Hall (KY) building.. You deleted its inner exclusion polygon and instead just added a park polygon. Semantically you made it so that this "park" is inside of this building, which it's not..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/144952411