Is addr:housename correct tag here? Is it part of the official address?
addr:*=*#Tags_for_individual_houses
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139876423

Hello.
You might want to consider using https://vzv.nyc it's easier to navigate and see relevant data.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139867604

Hello.
It seems like you combined 2 pizza nodes into one mixing their addresses. Could you explain what you were trying to do here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139855247

wow.
I'm surprised your browser didn't explode from so many changes in one changeset. :)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139853210

Hello.
When mapping features, please pay attention not to accidentally glue/attach them to each other. In this case you glued no-standing traffic sign to a sidewalk. iD editor has a tendency to snap things to each other so please pay attention to that.👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139849448

Hello.
When mapping sidewalks please try to split them where streets change, so that in the future it'll be easier to associate relevant sidewalks to relevant streets. In this case you drew a single sidewalk along Rhinelander Ave, White Plains Rd and Sagamore St, but this should've been 3 separate paths.👍🙂
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139838881

Perhaps instead of note= it's more suitable for the description= tag?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139831445

I don't know if you saw my message on slack, but perhaps tagging this area as "place=square" is suitable..
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139757281

Hello.
Could you please explain why did you delete pedestrian paths here?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139801692

Hello.
If a street have been converted into a no cars area, it's still a street.. So instead of outright deleting it, it should instead be retagged as highway=pedestrian or other appropriate tag.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139796532

yes, i don't doubt it exists 🙂
It draw my attention because it looked like somebody was vandal-tagging a street-as-park for pokemon go😅 but then realized it was you.
the reason why i questioned park status is 1) it wasn't on nycgovparks.org 2)when i started looking further into it and saw those articles but it still didn't seem to me like what we normally tag as parks.

Are there street signs with that name, or if you were to mail something to 123 Paseo Park would it arrive to 123 34th Ave?

I do think it should be somehow tagged, but if it's not a street name I'm not sure how🤔
Maybe loc_name?

i know what strava is, but i don't use it.
are you biking or running?
i'm not understanding what you are trying to explain. So when you are going from a sidewalk of Riverside Drive across the overpass, it routes you only to the south of Greenway and not to the north?

are you using some navigation or routing software?

Hello.
The changes you made around the Brooklyn Bridge will be reverted. "highway=footway" already implies "foot=yes" without having to tag it. Additionally, you drew a new footway on top of existing one. That's obviously not correct.

What is your source that bikes are allowed everywhere in Flush Park?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139771048

Could you please elaborate why do you feel that this way is not two-way?

Hello.
Please note that mapping overlapping ways is not a correct approach.
Also please note that foot paths are assumed to be two-way ways without having to explicitly indicate it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139769846

Hello.
Similar to your previous edit, "direction=both" is not a valid tag. You can use "oneway=no" to explicitly indicate that traffic is allowed in both directions. However, this being a highway=footway, being able to go in both directions is implicit by default.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139765749

Hello.
Please note that "direction=both" is not a valid combination. If you want to indicate that a way allows traffic in both directions, the appropriate way to tag it would be "oneway=no".
Please see oneway=* for more detailed explanation.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139765737

Using the building's BIN you can look up its zoning documents which should contain general architectural drawings with height measurements of each section.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139760715