Hello.
Who exactly did you contact if that place haven't been in business for 7-8 years?🤨
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139230100

Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag Avenue L as oneway street? That doesn't seem correct...
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139248656

The fact that you want me to point out wrong data to you means YOU don't even know what is in that import that you just blindly submitted. If you knew, you'd clearly see corrupted phone numbers, corrupted website addresses.
Just becuase some biz in your import had names in all caps doesn't mean those are actual real names of those biz. If you would've actually verified that data, you'd see that. Additionally, as documented in osm.wiki/Names you supposed to Title Case normalize such biz names.

OSM is not intended to be a replacement for a menu or a catalog of what biz sells. Plus the values that you blindly imported are not only invalid, but also don't follow the guidelines of OSM values.

I used constructive approach with you before you went ahead and imported INVALID data into OSM for the 2nd time, and before you lied that you manually reviewed every single submission and before you lied that you manually submitted this data.

If that was the case, you wouldn't have these changesets on your account: 138592479, 138592481, 138592501, 138592509, 138592537, 138592566, 138592594, 138592771, 138595453, 138595472, 138595531, 138595609, 138595654, 138595786.

Such things don't just happen. You obviously used data-import tool without properly disclosing it.

The value of phone= tag is invalid as documented in phone=*#Usage
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600471

The values of both wikidata= and wikipedia:en= tags are invalid as documented in wikidata=* and wikipedia=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138600625

Additionally,
"S Grand Blvd" is not an appropriate street name as documented in osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it) and osm.wiki/Abbreviations

Furthermore, the value of service_times= tag is invalid since it doesn't follow the established syntax of that tag as documented in opening_hours=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138690456

"recreation=swimming_pool" is not an appropriate tag combination for this feature.
leisure=swimming_pool documents all the correct tags that are applicable to this feature.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138825367

The value of the charge= tag is incorrect as documented in charge=*
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/138826272

The value of name= in this POI is incorrect.
We have name= and short_name= as documented in short_name=*

I'll repeat here AGAIN since you obviously didn't read the other changeset comment:

phone numbers were in the wrong format or corrupted or mushed together.
websites were in the wrong format. without protocol or just completely wrong.
there were other tags with a ton of stuffed keywords... more like for seo rather than anything useful
many biz names were not normalized.

wtf is this... produce=apples;fruit and tree nuts;peach;pear;raspberry;tree nut;herbs and spices;beef;beef cows;lamb;mutton;sheep;honey;chicken;eggs;turkeys;asparagus;cucumber;eggplant;lettuce;mushrooms;potato;squash;tomato
product=hay;honeybees;horses;agritourism

And you have garbage data like this in too many nodes to allow that to be imported into OSM!

I told you already what kind of data problems were in the revert changeset.

If you would've followed the proper guidelines, those problems would've been spotted BEFORE the corrupted data was imported into OSM!
But since you DID NOT follow the guidelines and imported a huge amount of corrupted data into OSM, it's not acceptable to leave it in the database to hopefully let you repair it, ESPECIALLY since you replied more than 2 WEEKS LATER.
Fix your data first, show it to the community that it's correct and only then consider importing it again.

It doesn't matter that you used Excel. This is still undisclosed data import and you must follow what's written in osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Are we doing edit wars now?!
This edit WILL be reverted in full again until you correct all the data problems!
Furthermore, your account will be forwarded to DWG, which can result in account blocks or outright ban.

phone numbers were in the wrong format or corrupted or mushed together.
websites were in the wrong format. without protocol or just completely wrong.
there were other tags with a ton of stuffed keywords... more like for seo rather than anything useful
many biz names were not normalized.

like wtf is this... produce=apples;fruit and tree nuts;peach;pear;raspberry;tree nut;herbs and spices;beef;beef cows;lamb;mutton;sheep;honey;chicken;eggs;turkeys;asparagus;cucumber;eggplant;lettuce;mushrooms;potato;squash;tomato
product=hay;honeybees;horses;agritourism

Well then, your checking was bad and it had too many problems.

What is the actual location and address of this business? On their website it says address is 228 East 51st Street, yet below a map shows 235 East 51st Street.
Is this a sports club or a sports store?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139181905

How did you spot William Court mistake?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139115591

Hello.
This edit will be reverted in full since according to OSM wiki definition suburb is a more accurate tag value for Brooklyn. This has been discussed multiple times in the local community. It would be great if you consulted there first before making such significant changes.

changeset/139195544

In iD if you go into Background Settings panel, and enable "Show Background Panel" checkbox, it'll show you the age of satellite imagery, if it's available, so you can better figure out which one is the most recent.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139080250

Hmm. For some reason when I was looking earlier at the vintage of imagery it told me that esri clarify was newer than bing. Now it shows otherwise. I do see the feature you are referring to in bing imagery, but i'm not sure if it's a covered up pool. Its perimeter looks too flat. I'd expect a fence or something else. To me it looks more like different paving on the ground. Maybe a volleyball court or a playground. But ultimately on the big G it is clearly visible as a pool. 😉👍
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139079930