OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
111971691 about 4 years ago

Continue by mail, please check SPAM.

111971691 about 4 years ago

Yes. This is ongoing goal already for some time.
Bigger route master is not required by OSM rules, anyway this bigger route might be a "site" type. I wouldnt use it. We can always generate this list of Trieste Trasporti routes with https://overpass-turbo.eu/

111971691 about 4 years ago

okay, sorry for my offensive editing
> lines of trieste the same in order to group in the relationship
We have wiki page for this.
If you insist to have this relation, than please collect route_master relations (like are "Bus 39/", "Bus 42", "Bus 43", "Bus 44" relations without direction in name)

Bus lines in city may have just foward or backward - which use different part of round or where road splits, where we have 2-ways.
We need to have this separate so we can apply timetable on lines so we can than use routing in practical use - how and WHEN to come from A to B by bus.
BRs

111971691 about 4 years ago

This relation is useless. You have networg tag for this. 42, 43, 44, and 39/ were correct but you made a mess.

When you collect all together it's imposible to add departments time
Please, read the documentation!
osm.wiki/Public_transport

Or if you want, it's collecting here:
osm.wiki/User:Mitjajez/public_transport

110429477 about 4 years ago

No. Solo una.
Opicina => Piazza Oberdan via Monte Grisa
NON È
Opicina <= Piazza Oberdan via Monte Grisa

92788125 over 4 years ago

> Niste odgovorili na nobeno moje vprašanje.
Predvsem povezava do zgodovine ne odgovarja na vprašanje: od kod hudiča ste dobili podatke za izgradnjo (geološke) regije?
I'm sorry, my italian is not good enought to replay using 'Lei'.
You had claim that I create "Gruppo del Charbonnel" which is not true and this can be seen in relation history.
I did not get data and I did not create this. Please write to author of this or suggest/make changes with sources. I cannot help you here. Clear now?

92788125 over 4 years ago

> Mi spieghi il significato del "Gruppo Charbonnel" che hai inventato su un confine arbitrario?
Območje "Gruppo Charbonnel" je že bilo predhodno ustvarjeno.

> Inoltre ti segnale che boundary si usa su confini amministrativi e non su suddivisioni geologiche.
To ni čisto res.

> Ti chiedo gentilmente infine su quali fonti ti sei ispirato per creare questa invenzione.
Zgodovino relacije "Gruppo del Charbonnel" si lahko ogledate na relation/7467988/history in vabljeni, da dodate vire po potrebi.

89261119 about 5 years ago

That would be fine for me. Wikidata ID is one, but for wikipedia I belive should be sloveninan page, which probably have better content for sliveninan rivers than other languages.

93025525 about 5 years ago

This way has been before there all around alps and I merging this on the same line as parts of Alps are defines.
Tnx for Inspector link, I'll do my best.

93025525 about 5 years ago

I know, that's why I marked changelog with WiP - "work in progress ". Relation was wrong, mountain Storžič is in Kamnik-Savinja alps, you override this fix, that's why I reverted your changes.

92311473 about 5 years ago

Alora fa corregere.

Il piano è considerato stabilito sulla base della derivata di altezza (variazione di altezza).

Pianura Padana è Po Valley https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Po_Valley (come io scritto in changelog)
(Padska nižina in sloveno)

Questo non è dal:
Valle Po non hai differente nome in inglese https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valle_Po
(Padska dolina in sloveno)
chi è come Lei ha scrito in Alpi (Pian del Re).

Spero di essere stato comprensibile.

92311473 about 5 years ago

Padsko nižino seveda. Padska dolina je menda v Zahodnih alpah (točneje Ligurskih alpah), ne?
Razumem, rob nižine še ni oster, a dovolj dober, da je bolje kot nič. Relacija tako velikega geografskega elementa kot je Padska dolina še ni obstajal. Na severu jih bom popravil do relacije 2698607.

92008630 about 5 years ago

That's what i'm looking for here, what are "geographic elements" here?
What is on the other side of border of the Italian geographical region?

92008630 about 5 years ago

Wiki shows that it expanded during time. This clears that it is historical. It may exist also today but it shrinked - need to correct todays borders of this region.

89059310 over 5 years ago

'Border' is already added, but it's historical, does not exist anymore. I'm preparing to move it to OHM.

86726896 over 5 years ago

I don't want to make truble. You can always use GTranslate or whatever.
In Trieste si officale parla anche sloveno. / V Trstu uradno govorimo tudi slovensko.
Since my italian is stil not good enough and since OSM is international project I prefer english.
Alora, non sono siguro per parcheggio oggi, pero o visto parcheggo nel ortophoto. Potere un photo mapillary.
I'll update when i'll get it.
Grazie per reporto.

86726896 over 5 years ago

Potrebujemo mapillary fotografijo, na ortofoto, ki je mogoče zastarel, je tam parkirišče. Na Maxar Premium sliki pa ni vidno.

86608302 over 5 years ago

wille, city's local name is bilingual. That's why you should restore to bilingual notation like are places around Triest (if I use it's international name)

80902493 almost 6 years ago

Na kakšni podlagi je vnešen rečni kanal?

49508434 over 8 years ago

why?