OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
58972380 almost 7 years ago

Yes, I think “Cincinnati Columbus Road;Columbus Cincinnati Road” would be the most appropriate name. It’s sort of like how bilingual areas will have multiple names in name, even though the name:xy tags are also tagged on the same feature. In this case, both this road and Cincinnati Dayton Road run parallel in the same township, creating some potential for confusion if a road is announced with a different name than the signage.

Unfortunately, OSRM doesn’t know how to use name:forward and name:backward, so both names will be announced. But there are lots of roads in the Midwest that have very different names on each side of the road, so I think it’s a bug that will eventually need to be fixed anyways.

Thanks as always for being responsive to changeset comments. This is admittedly an edge case, so I understand why you might’ve thought it was appropriate to simplify the name.

58972380 almost 7 years ago

I disagree with the road name change in this changeset. As seen in https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/4544#issuecomment-335339773, both “Cincinnati Columbus Road” and “Columbus Cincinnati Road” are signposted equally prominently depending on the direction of travel.

66118008 almost 7 years ago

Hi, thanks for contributing your business details to OSM. Unfortunately, I had to revert this change in changeset/66723568, because you accidentally renamed 18th Avenue instead of adding your business. You can try again, but this time, please select the building that houses your business, rather than the street, before adding the name and details. Thank you.

66723568 almost 7 years ago

This reverts changeset/66118008, which incorrectly conflated a business with the street it’s on.

46690365 almost 7 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66696873 where the changeset comment is: Reverted changeset/46690365: Pokémon Go flora and fauna

60247542 almost 7 years ago

Thanks for untangling this road and all its turn restrictions into a proper dual carriageway. That must’ve been quite tedious! Unfortunately, this changeset introduced numerous routing errors, including broken road and bus route relations, missing turn restrictions, and missing traffic lights and crosswalks. A highly trafficked left turn from Colerain onto I-275 was deleted. Lane counts and turn lanes also became inaccurate, because :backward tags weren’t moved over to the new parallel way. These errors have been fixed in changesets 66490305 and 66501664. In the future, please try to copy the existing way more comprehensively when creating a parallel way for a dual carriageway – that would prevent most of the errors that occurred here. Thank you for your help!

62443797 almost 7 years ago

The Torrey Pines subdivision doesn’t extend to all these properties. If you want to express that these adjoining properties are residential, please create a separate landuse area that isn’t named.

62480116 almost 7 years ago

Hi, thanks for adding buildings and sidewalks in the area. Please remember to connect the sidewalks to the road network, for example by adding crossing ways that intersect with streets. That way, walking routers will use the sidewalks instead of avoiding them because of the extra detours around cul-de-sacs. Thanks again!

66287502 almost 7 years ago

This changeset reverts changeset/65776972 because it duplicated changeset/65776820.

65776972 almost 7 years ago

This changeset duplicated changeset/65776820, so it was reverted in changeset/66287502.

65776972 almost 7 years ago

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/66287502 where the changeset comment is:

66261145 almost 7 years ago

Also named Banklick Creek and removed it from boundary relations.

63499397 almost 7 years ago

Note that routers assume foot=no for highway=cycleway, I suppose because bike-only cycleways are common in Europe. Fixed in changeset/66035531.

65758924 about 7 years ago

…maneuver override, athletic fields

65622972 about 7 years ago

I moved a couple addresses from garages to nearby existing buildings in changeset/65623166.

65522868 about 7 years ago

I got a bit carried away here by carrying out this change across the state, rather than in the corner of the state where I usually map. I’ve written up a proposal for standardizing on the “SR” prefix here: osm.wiki/Talk:Indiana#SR_for_state_roads

63560184 about 7 years ago

I’m not sure all of these should be place=suburb. German Village Historic District is definitely neighborhood-level, as are most NRHP districts.

Until now, I think place=suburb had only been used for places within a place=city in Ohio, not within a place=town. I’ve always thought of place=suburb as being sort of equal in rank to place=town except lying within a place=city, and renderers such as osm-carto have reflected that. With this change, we may want to promote Hamilton to a city, but that’s problematic because it isn’t the core of a metropolitan area.

62796809 about 7 years ago

This changeset incorrectly changed the name of an airport to that of one of its service roads. Fixed in changeset/64714662.

62759233 about 7 years ago

changeset/64645689 restores the historic school POI, separating it from the turning circle.

63092956 about 7 years ago

Hi, thanks for your contribution to OSM. Unfortunately, you inadvertently deleted Bhopal’s city label from the map by turning it into a government office. I undid this changeset and your following two changesets in changeset/64617015 but restored the Smart City Bhopal POI in changeset/64617043. In the future, when you want to add a new POI, such as a business or office, please add a new point rather than modifying an existing one. (When editing the map in iD, press the Point button in the toolbar to add a new point.)

Regardless, I encourage you to continue contributing to OSM. We all make mistakes, but the map ultimately gets better because of people like you. Best regards.