Minh Nguyen's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 64617015 | about 7 years ago | I restored the Smart City Bhopal office POI as a separate POI in changeset/64617043. |
| 63477264 | about 7 years ago | One option, by analogy with underground parking structures and natural caves, is to avoid mapping the whole structure as a building (but maybe as something else) and focus on mapping only the entrances as features in their own right. |
| 63477264 | about 7 years ago | There are established ways of tagging underground subway stations and tunnels, but not subterranean developments in general that I know of. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/552 tracks rendering such structures in a sensible way. |
| 62896281 | over 7 years ago | Añadir los códigos FIPS 6-4 en las relaciones de límites de municipios de Puerto Rico. |
| 62895570 | over 7 years ago | Independent cities have both FIPS 6-4 and FIPS 55-3 codes. This changeset only adds FIPS 6-4 codes, for consistency with other county-level administrative boundary relations. A future change that introduces FIPS 55-3 codes for all municipalities would have to figure out where the codes should go on independent cities. |
| 38058465 | over 7 years ago | I think this was the remnants of a relation that originally excluded this area. It makes no sense for these neighborhoods to be simultaneously part of a city and “unincorporated”. I deleted the relation outright in changeset/62894835. |
| 59631625 | over 7 years ago | I noticed that this reversion touched a number of address points like node/5021351015. The Vietnamese urban address format is not a great fit for the addr:* tagging scheme, so something like addr:housenumber=7/14/12/3/23 wouldn’t strike me as a bad import but rather an honest attempt at shoehorning a real address into existing tags. |
| 62600997 | over 7 years ago | Thanks! By the way, I changed the shared driveway to service=pipestem and documented my reasoning in osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:service%3Ddriveway#Pipestems. Feel free to join that discussion or start a new one in the tagging@ mailing list. |
| 62453066 | over 7 years ago | By the way, the Mapbox imagery layer has the most recent imagery in this part of Northern Kentucky. |
| 62083662 | over 7 years ago | Made some corrections in changeset/62255924. If you repurpose a traffic light node on an approach into a crosswalk node, remember to treat all approaches equally and add the traffic light somewhere else within the intersection.
|
| 61703323 | over 7 years ago | Made some corrections in changeset/62254954. Remember to keep crosswalks separate from traffic light nodes (in the event that traffic lights were mapped on approaches instead of at intersection nodes) and connect crosswalks to the road network.
|
| 62152701 | over 7 years ago | Reverted in changeset/62153827. OSM is not an appropriate venue for voicing political opposition. |
| 10404969 | over 7 years ago | By the way, this changeset is over six years old. If you’re seeing a major tagging problem, it could be due to a more recent change by someone else. |
| 10404969 | over 7 years ago | Can you clarify what you mean? I didn’t change any place tags; I only added name:vi tags for features that already had place=town. |
| 62020302 | over 7 years ago | I’m sure this change makes it a little easier to query for USPS boxes, for now at least, but as someone who consistently uses operator=United States Postal Service, I was really caught off-guard by this wide-ranging change. You gave the U.S. community about an hour and a half on a Sunday afternoon to “vote” on a proposal on Slack before uploading this changeset. If it were a matter of fixing a blatant typo or changing this tag in one city or state, that wouldn’t be such a big deal, but you saw the need to propose the change in the first place, so giving folks time to respond would have been more courteous. In the future, please exercise a little more patience and consider posting to a forum where your proposal would be less likely to be overlooked, such as the talk-us mailing list. Thank you for your consideration. |
| 61934167 | over 7 years ago | Technically, “Huỳnh Phi Long” is a homophonic translation, not a calque. Apologies for the mixup. |
| 61605955 | over 7 years ago | The DigitalGlobe Standard imagery shows what looks like the beginnings of construction, so I guess it’s quite imminent if it hasn’t already happened. |
| 60703508 | over 7 years ago | It’s probably best to keep landcover like natural=wood separate from the road network and other landuses, since they can often overlap with landuse=residential etc. Also, remember to map church buildings as amenity=place_of_worship, even if the church grounds are tagged landuse=religious. |
| 60701279 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for these changes. Note that the businesses in a single strip mall building should be mapped as standalone points near the center of the business, if possible. If you’d like to map the entrances, there’s a separate preset for building entrances (which also lets you indicate which entrance is the main entrance). |
| 53030699 | over 7 years ago | Thanks for making these updates. Apparently some of the ways still had construction and access=no tags on them, causing routers to avoid them. Fixed in changeset/60477725. |