Mikey Co's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 135122626 | over 2 years ago | A big improvement, thanks. I had been thinking of doing something similar, but hadn't plucked up the guts to do so! |
| 133592851 | almost 3 years ago | The routing is quite messy here, as various cycle routes meet, and the main east west route switches from the side of the road to going through the middle, via a pedestrian crossing |
| 133592851 | almost 3 years ago | Corrected |
| 118959194 | almost 3 years ago | Thanks Tom for noticing this!
|
| 118959194 | almost 3 years ago | I've got NO idea why they have a highway tag instead of a building one! I assume I must have typed something wrong for one then copied them across to the others, LOL as they're definitely buildings
|
| 131482163 | almost 3 years ago | True, they're a bit more up to date than the other aerial shots! |
| 127431419 | almost 3 years ago | Hello. Those aren't the Branch Hill allotments, which are at the corner of Branch Hill/Frognall Rise and Oak Hill Way. The area you've mapped is just scrubby grassland |
| 131397967 | almost 3 years ago | I've changed this, though having it just as an entrance is less informative, as the rendering doesn't now give the name of the station, which isn't at all obvious due to the distance from the "main" Bond Street station |
| 111338724 | almost 3 years ago | Thanks for that custom imagery link, that's really useful!
|
| 111338724 | almost 3 years ago | I will correct this based on the out of date aerial photo and my recollections |
| 111338724 | almost 3 years ago | Hello
|
| 121098740 | over 3 years ago | Bedfordshire are planning to upgrade FP14 to become a restricted byway, like the Herts side. Interestingly the maps suggest that along part of the route, there are parallel paths, one on either side of the boundary!
|
| 119767709 | over 3 years ago | Added. |
| 116184856 | almost 4 years ago | That sound fair. The top entrance (at The Ridgeway) was locked for everyone when I was there, maybe I was unlucky. I've no idea when the whole scheme is meant to be open - I've not seen any details - at the moment the path is sand, will it be tarmaced? - and at some point I assume the style opposite will be removed too!
|
| 116184856 | almost 4 years ago | I made a Fix me note on this path, as it doesn't seem to be open yet (unlike the other section that you have excellently mapped) having walked it yesterday. |
| 116027020 | almost 4 years ago | The alignment of Cricklewood Lane isn't correct. It now cuts the corner across where the demolished building on the corner was (as I mapped it).
|
| 111547638 | about 4 years ago | The description above has nothing to do with this changeset! It should read, updating the status of this car park and adding in a £2 parking fee |
| 106266844 | over 4 years ago | Sorry my error, please correct it to whatever it should be |
| 105514941 | over 4 years ago | Apologies, but I don't know the service road in question, I was just adjusting the Relations which use it (as I intend at some point to do one of the designated Hikes). It was venredd who originally created this, and priymose who then added the access=private, so maybe of them would know? Michael |
| 105371613 | over 4 years ago | Thanks Bernard, I now understand my mistake and have deleted this. I was trying to add the path/highway to a relation, rather than create a new one. I think I know how to do this now |